Laserfiche WebLink
overall natural resources evaluation. Additional field notes will be <br />gathered on related natural resource management concerns such as <br />erosion/sedimentation, land use concerns, and stormwater runoff. <br />u Task 5- Natural Resource Evaluation <br />November 2001 -� January 2002 <br />Classification of Natural Communities <br />Minnesota "s Native Vegetation, A Key to Natural Communities <br />[Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1993) will be used to <br />classify natural communities. This key is the best available statewide <br />guide for classifying native plant communities. For "human created <br />areas," common descriptive names such as "old field" or "conifer <br />plantation" will be used. <br />Each identified natural and human created community will also be <br />classified using the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS). <br />MLCCS coding will be to Level 5(greatest level of detail) and entered <br />into a G8�compatible database. <br />Ecological Ranking of Natural Communities <br />Each natural community that meets the criteria for classification under <br />the methodology of the MN DNR Natural Heritage Program will be <br />assigned an ecological ranking, ranging from A to D. An "A" community <br />is the highest in ecological quality; "D" the lowest. Standard ecological <br />criteria used to evaluate the health of natural communities will be used <br />to determine the quality rankings. These criteria include degree of native <br />species diversity, age of trees, and amount of disturbance. <br />The rankings reflect how closely the community area being studied <br />resembles an intact or "pristine" community of its type in the regi0n— <br />"A" quality communities are most like intact natural areas; "D" quality <br />communities have been highly altered from this standard. Due to the <br />high level of human activity in urbanizing landscapes, "A" quality <br />communities are rare. <br />Lake and Watershed Assessment <br />Based on available data, Bennett and Langton Lakes will be evaluated for <br />their ability to support the uses designated by the City. Using existing <br />information on sub-watershed size and land use composition, a <br />watershed and lake response model will be constructed to estimate the <br />pollutant loading entering each lake from its watershed. MLCCS <br />coverage for the areas of concern could be valuable for this task if it is <br />available, since this database would contain vital information on <br />impervious coverage that forms the basis of a good watershed modeling <br />effort. Lacking this data, existing land uses data from the City of Roseville <br />will be used and impervious coverage estimated. <br />❑ Task 6 - GIS Mapping <br />September 2001 • October 2001 <br />Information gathered in the field inventory portion of the project can <br />best utilized if it is available in a Geographic Information System (GIS� <br />format. GIS provides accurate, detailed mapping of natural resource <br />� Cllj� o/ Rosev%//e Nawral Resource Management 6 <br />�i Bonest ioo, RoSP�P, .9/)de/lIk and Associates, lnc. <br />