2001_0521_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

69 The project as proposed is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). 6.10 With proper adherence to the Fire, Building, City and State Codes, the proposed project does not appear to adversely affect the public health, safety, and/or general welfare. 7.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 7.1 Based on the findings outlined in Section 6.0 of this report, staff recommends approval of the rezoning and the PUD CONCEPT DEVELOPI�TENT PLAN for a residential mixed use planned unit development with "R-8" base zoning (R-PUD) that allows a mix of manufactured housing, traditional high density housing, and limited seasonal recreational vehicle parking and accessory uses within the property known as the Roseville Mobile Home Park located at 2599 Le�ngton Avenue. 8.0 PLANNING C01�T1�TISSION REC01�T1�TENDATIONS The Planning Commission held the required public hearing on May 09, 2001. An excerpt from their meeting comments follows: Chair Rhody opened the hearing and requested Community Development Director, Dennis Welsch, to pravide a verbal summary of the staff report dated May 9, 2001. Larry Salera, representing Roseville Estates LLC, stated they are excited about the new proposals, and would like the opportunity to imprave the parking and landscaping. Member Cunningham asked about maving units. Larry Salera stated no units would be lost. Member Wilke asked ifthe RVs are owned by the residents in the Park, (it may be outside owners). Could the R Vs be eliminated? (Yes, if more manufactured housing was possible). Member Cunningham asked how mar�y R Vs are in the Park at this time (None). Member Rhoa'y asked if the owners have met with the residents; this planning process requires inclusion of the residents, Member Rhody encouraged resident meetings with the owners (no formal meeting has been held to date). Member Cunningham asked if R Us have no place in the future? What could go on the site in the future? (4 manufactured housing sites). Helen Grifjin, resident, noted that the children are located in the center of the site; the plan should locate the playground in that area. Ms. Gri�n asked if a privacy fence wouldpreclude the mud turtle migration and stated she liked to look at the adjacent pond. Visitors were allowed to park adjacent to units; the new parking is too far from units. Could parking be looked into in detail? Larry Salera noted new solidfence would be installed Parking is the tough issue. By taking R Vs away from the front, parking is also lost, PF3225 RCA (052101) Page 6 of 10