My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0611_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0611_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 3:18:17 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:37:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.4 Upon completion of its 1997 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the city had compiled a list <br />of properties whereby the zoning and Comp Plan designations did not match. In the case <br />of the subject parcel, located in Planning District 12, the Comprehensive Land Use Plan <br />designation is I�'igh Density Residential. The e�sting land use (designated single family <br />attached) map is a remnant of years past when the owner lived in and rented units within <br />the structure. Today we would identify this as "multi family." <br />3.0 <br />3.1 <br />3.2 <br />PROJECT REVIEW <br />Mr. Prokop has indicated an interest in completing interior remodeling and constructing a <br />detached garage, but does not intend to change the use of the five-unit structure. <br />The following R-3A District requirements would apply to the site: <br />Kequirements <br />Lot Width <br />Lot Depth <br />Lot Size Per Unit <br />Front Yard Setback <br />Rear Yard Setback <br />Side Yard Setback (south <br />City Code <br />85 feet <br />100 feet <br />2,000 — 2,800 sq. ft./unit <br />Three stories or 30 feet <br />30 feet <br />30 feet <br />15 feet <br />Condition <br />110 feet <br />148 feet <br />16,28o sq. ft./3,256 <br />Two stories <br />30 feet <br />52 feet <br />7 feet <br />ft <br />Variance <br />None <br />None <br />unit None <br />None <br />None <br />None <br />9 feet <br />Side Yard Setback (north) 15 feet 35 feet None <br />4.0 STAFF COMIV�NTS/FINDINGS <br />4.1 Staff has determined that rezoning the properiy to a zoning designation consistent with <br />the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is necessary to appropriately deal with the pre- <br />e�sting non-conforming use issue. <br />4.2 Through review of the Zoning Ordinance, staff has determined that the zoning <br />designation that best suits the properiy and its current use as a multiple family residential <br />structure (five rental units) is the R-3A zone. <br />4.3 Because of the change in zoning from R-2 to R-3A, staff has concluded that a nine-foot <br />variance to the side yard setback (e�sting condition) for the south side of the principal <br />structure is necessary. <br />4.4 A non-conforming use can continued but is subject to applicable State Statutes and City <br />Ordinance regarding alterations, repair after damage, discontinuance of use, and <br />intensification of use. <br />PF3305 .- RCA 06 110 1.doc Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.