My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0626_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0626_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 10:25:26 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:37:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
responsibility of new development to ensure compatibility with e�sting uses <br />(adj acent uses outside the Master Plan area). <br />f. The City encourages the use of shared parking, ramped parking and a regional <br />water retention plan when appropriate to reduce impervious surfaces and increase <br />green space. The Twin Lakes Design Guidelines (1988) are the current Design <br />Guidelines until superceded by amendments or "parcel specific" planned unit <br />development ordinances. <br />g. To ensure orderly, fair, efficient and cost-effective redevelopment, the City will <br />use eminent domain — condemnation — in cases where acquisition of the land area <br />and construction of public roads and parks, utilities and/or storm sewer are <br />deemed in the public's interest by the City Council. In addition, to induce further <br />new private investment that is in the public's best interest and ensure that the City <br />is paying a fair price while not overpaying for speculative development, <br />condemnation may be used as a last option in redevelopment negotiation process <br />to determine a fair market value of the properiy. All condemnation initiatives <br />require City Council approval. <br />Further objectives of the renewed master plan are outlined in the full Twin Lakes Master <br />Plan prepared by staff and reviewed by the Planning Commission on November 8, 2000 <br />and December 13,200 1. This master plan document serves as the official amendment to <br />the Comprehensive Plan for Twin Lakes as a`Business Park". All the elements of the <br />plan will be addressed and reviewed as parcels are redeveloped. <br />7.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS and COMMENT <br />7.1 The Planning Staff recommends approval of Scenario 1(as opposed to Scenario lA with <br />a retail component) as most consistent with the comprehensive plan and vision for the <br />Twin Lakes Area. <br />7.2 While there were no significant traffic impact differences between the high-tech scenario <br />(1) and the retail scenario (lA) during the normal shopping week, there can be a <br />significant difference during peak holiday shopping periods. In addition, the number of <br />head of household jobs and payroll created for the high-tech scenario is significantly <br />higher. The Regan area that was studied for a possible change to big box retail is <br />currently designated industrial and zoned I-2 general industrial. <br />7.3 The Community Development and Public Works Staff also support and recommend the <br />findings of the AUAR and the Plan that address mitigation factors to minimize the <br />environmental impacts created based upon the renewed Twin Lakes Master Plan. <br />7.4 As the area redevelops, the environmental impacts created are not significant and with <br />the implementation of the mitigation factors the impacts are minimal especially when <br />considering the alternative of "no redevelopment". The opportunity lost by allowing the <br />area to remain underutilized is significant. Not only are there economic benefits with <br />$400 million in new value, 5,000 new jobs and 600 new housing units, there are also <br />intangible community benefits by providing a master plan that: <br />PF3232 — RCA(062601) Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.