My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0827_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0827_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:49:35 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:38:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOW TI�REFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />NTinnesota, that it adopts and memorializes the following findings regarding the subject application for <br />a conditional use permit: <br />Findings: <br />I. Section 1004.02C 10 of the Roseville Zoning code allows cemeteries as a conditional use within <br />the R-1, Single Family Residence District. Ordinance 1072 specifies that no cemetery, place of <br />burial, or crematorium of the dead human person sha11 be established or set apart, nor sha11 any <br />existing cemeteries or crematoriums be enlarged without a permit issued by the City Council <br />(City Code Section 40 1.0 1) <br />2, The issuance of a conditional use permit under Section 10 13 of the Code requires the <br />consideration of the following matters: <br />Compatibility with adjoining properties <br />Impacts on traffic and public facilities <br />Impacts on properiy value <br />Impacts on general health, safety, and public welfare <br />Compatibility with the Roseville Comprehensive Plan. <br />3, The proposed use will emit "criteria" pollutants and "to�c" pollutants (Source: Materials <br />submitted by applicant, All Crematory, Anne Jackson et al.). <br />4, Emission of these to�c materials is not practically avoidable or controllable under current <br />cremation processes (Source: Environmental Info. From Industrial Equipment and Engineering <br />Co., 6/21/2001). <br />S, The emission of inercury, hydrogen chloride, and other pollutants from the proposed crematory <br />adds to the risk of exposure to these public health dangers for the residents, businesses and <br />users of public facilities in the vicinity of the proposed crematory. <br />6, Currently, the cremation rate in the United States is appro�mately 24%. Within the ne�t 10 <br />years it is anticipated that the demand for cremation services will increase nearly 70%. <br />(Source: Letter of Erny Czirok dated 7une 29, 2001). <br />7, In Minnesota cremations have increased from 1,622 in 1969 to 10,950 in 1999, and Ramsey <br />County statistics parallel the increased use of cremation (Source: NIN. Department of Health, <br />City Community Development Staff Research, 6/14/O1). <br />8, For 2000, the statewide cremation percentage was 30.30% or about 32 per day (Source: fax <br />from Timothy J. Koch dated 7/23/O1). <br />9, Updated Federal and state standards regarding crematory emissions, location, and operating <br />procedures have not yet been promulgated to adequately address the growing use of cremation, <br />nor developments in medical science such as brachytherapy that that could introduce an <br />additional environmental health threat, in spite of the 1990 Federal Clean Air Act amendments <br />that require the Environmental Protection Agency to develop new source performance <br />standards and emission guidelines for crematories. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.