My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0827_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0827_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:49:35 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:38:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
structures with contiguous properties. <br />4. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties. <br />S. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare. <br />6. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan.+ <br />5.2 Staff has reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in Section <br />10 13 .0 1.D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and concludes the following: <br />A. The proposed detached accessory building will not create additional traffic nor <br />the need for additional public facilities. <br />B. The detached accessory building can be partially screened by placing appropriate <br />landscaping along the east property line, even though, the garage will be adjacent <br />a neighboring detached garage. The sides of the garage can be modified with <br />windows to minimize the mass of the west and east sides of the building. <br />C. The detached accessory structure will not have an impact on the market value of <br />contiguous property. <br />D. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. <br />E. The project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation (via the CUP and <br />variance process) as a Low Density Residential use. <br />F. Conditions may be attached to the CUP that would mitigate the impact on <br />adjacent properties including such items as roof gutters for controlling drainage, <br />landscape screening, windows, building materials, and roof truss design. <br />6.0 POLICY $,� FISCAL IMPLICATION <br />6.1 The Comprehensive Plan and the Roseville Housing Improvement Plan encourage <br />maintaining and improving residential properties and infrastructure, as well as <br />reconstruction and rebuilding of residential structures (and neighborhoods) throughout <br />the community. <br />6.2 There are no additional fiscal implications and no public infrastructure improvements or <br />extensions necessary. <br />7.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />7.1 Staff recommends approval of a 108 square foot variance to Section 1004.O1A3 an d a <br />176 square foot variance to Section 1004.O1A5 of the Roseville City Code, and a <br />conditional use permit to allow a 1,008 square foot detached accessory building <br />(garage) at 1166 Laurie Road based on the comments and findings outlined in <br />Section 3, 4, 5 and 6, of the project report dated August 27, 2001. <br />PF3325 RCA (082701) Page 6 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.