My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_1126_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_1126_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 9:28:01 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:39:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Department Ap roval: <br />� �� <br />! > <br />Manager Reviewed <br />Date: 11/26/O1 <br />Item No.: r'� <br />Agenda Section <br />R�Y^v:t� ��.,^,v R w^vmm�n���^v,^,� <br />Description: Understanding On Taa Increment District Decertification as per Department <br />of Revenue Request <br />Background <br />On November 29, 2000, the City Council approved decertification of certain tax increment districts <br />and parcels. Under the Minnesota State Statues, any decertifications must be approved by the <br />Minnesota Department of Revenue. The approval process is to assure the State of Minnesota that <br />any decertifications implemented by local governments wiil not require tne State to make up debt <br />shortfalls. <br />Since the (:ity has now defeased the remaining outstanding tax increment ciebt, there is no reason ror <br />a shortfall in covering the debt service payments. However, since the State has established the <br />procedure outlined in the attached letter, the City is required to provide a resolut�n to the <br />Department of Revenue assuring that any future grant applications to cover tax increment shortfalls, <br />would reflect an adjustment showing the "missed opportunity" of pooling tax increments from <br />decertified districts. <br />Financial Implications <br />Approval of this resolution, will have no effect on the City's financial position since, the outstanding <br />�,._. : _. a,.�� �..,, t,.,... a,.r ..,.,.a <br />L[lli 1I1V1G1IlGlll UGVI lld5 UGG(1 UG1Gil5GU. <br />Staff Recommendations <br />Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the attached resolution. <br />Council Action <br />Motion to approve the attached resolution providing for any future tax increment debt coverage <br />shortfall application to the State of Minnesota, would reflect an adjustment for the "missed <br />opportunity" of pooling tax increments from decertified districts and parcels. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.