Laserfiche WebLink
November 14, 2001 <br />Ciry of Roseville <br />Planning Cvmmission Chairman <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br />re: Rebuttal for Staff Report <br />Brad Hoff -1897 Shady Beach Ave., Roseville MN 55113 <br />Planning File #3347 <br />Dear <br />There is a loophole in the Roseville Building Code to build a plastic fence to shoreline. <br />It is a"taking without compensation" on the entire lake and the city itself. <br />Staff Report – August 1990 <br />0 <br />"Variance approved by the City Council did not include an allowance for a 6'/z' tall fence. Length of <br />fence was 43 feet and did not obstruct the view of the lake. Now it is 165 feet in length. <br />Building Code <br />People who live on lakes call that portion that faces the lake their front yard — ordinance should <br />address shoreline, not backyards abutting the lakeshore. <br />• Paragraph 2.2 – Building permit was issued in error, so the city is trying to get off the hook for <br />damages. <br />• Paragraph 2.3 –"Inadvertent error" on Building Permit A01-282 <br />• Paragraph 3.3 – Installed the existing 6'/Z' tall white plastic fence in violation of Section <br />1012.02B2 of Roseville Code. <br />• Paragraph 3.6 – Minnesota DNR – DNR says it is tragic and poses environmental issues. <br />� Paragraph 3.7 – Our bathroom and bedroom face the street; we have blinds. <br />• Paragraph 4.3 – Undue hardship <br />