My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_1126_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_1126_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 9:28:01 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:39:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e. Timeline <br />Beets noted the School District's effort to analyze their facility needs. Kysylyczyn <br />called on Superintendent Thein, who elaborated on that effort, indicating that he hoped <br />for a final report about the school district's facility and financial needs by the end of this <br />academic year in June, 2002. <br />£ Questions; Comments <br />Council Member Mastel commented on the necessity of cooperation with the School <br />District. Commission Member Jacobson asked about how demographic data influenced <br />the School District's facility decisions and may affect the City's community center <br />decision. Commission Member Smith asked about the timing of voter referenda <br />questions involving both the School District and the City. Council Member Klausing <br />asked Thein what benefits the School District could offer the City respecting a proposed <br />community center, and what benefits he thought a City community center might provide <br />to the School District. <br />g. Next Steps: Moving Forward? <br />Commission Member Freeman stated a desire to see the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission recommend a timeframe for City consideration of a community center. <br />4. Park Improvement Program (Capital) Funding <br />This agenda item was not discussed by the group, given the shortness of time. <br />5. Park Maintenance (Operations) Support <br />This agenda item was not discussed by the group, given the shortness of time. <br />6. City Parks and Recreation System Plan Update <br />Several Members of the Parks and Recreation Commission commended the proposed update to <br />the System Plan for Council approval. Bierscheid and Beets indicated this item would come to <br />the Council at its November 26`h meeting. <br />Attest: <br />Neal J. Beets, City Manager <br />John Kysylyczyn, Mayor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.