2001_1126_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ATTACHMENT A In camfn� to t6is point th� ere�ning I have learnsd w6at an eaormou9 debt the citizens of Ro�vllle owe to aIl the p�ple who s�ve on tlie dty coun�cil as v►ell as a11 the other commLuiona that easi� khem. T6t unbeltevably tedious mattecs t6at seem to dtag on far hatus every wcek make me truty �►ppt�eclate what pan're daing for u�. P�ease keep up the good. work. I'm hopefui that the ini'ormed dtize�ns of RoseviIIe wili se�nd yon help thls fall. My imp►es�on of dty counal pol�cs when I mored into Roseville in th�e mid 8as wes thnt of a send6ox fnll of 5 year otds. FYnaIIp, after the results of the Jim Aadre Aasco had piayed th��res ont in subsequent elections the cou�cit behaved in �rhat i was proud to call my dty coimcil. 71iere was often disagi�ment, occasioaaIly even heated. Hawever, I was comfortable 6ecause I fett that tlte oppusiog positions were the result of hoieest dit'ferences of opinton. Sowever, sInce John Kysplyczyn took officei the saadbox analogy has come back to mind, but this time I pald attention aad belleve that it's nat a sandbox Full of chlldren t�t one. � Accord[ng to his sworn tesHmony, during his camp�ign Joha Kysylyczym arcepted 5300 from each of Four people closely associated with a development compsny that I believe had an active lawsuit pending agai�ost the city. Supporting document: JoLn KysyJyczyn deposib[on in Jeffrey L. NieLqen (plantit� vs. Dantd G. Wall (defendant) Pp 36 • 37 He was subpoeriaed to serve as a witness for this sa� development company ia its tawsuit ageinst Raseville. As a taymsn� Wis makes me won�er whether John Kysylyczyn was oonsldered to be on the other side. In his depoaition resulting from Wat subpoena John Kysylyczyn admits to introducing people from this company to infiuential M3nnesota Le�slators and essentlaUy helped them io6by for changes to state law which, ii pvt into etfect, would have poteatially cast the city 519,000,000 (according to a stafe auditor's report). 17ils aetion, had it succeeded, coWd have exposed Rosevitle taxpAyers to a ruunovs debt. For thts reason 1 6etieve John Kysytyczyn's behavior to 6e unet6ical and to 6e in vfoladon of the uath of ofiice. Supportlmg doeumeot: do6n Kysylyczyn cleposition in Jeffrey L. Nielsen et al. vs. City of Roseville Pp 158 - 161 As further evideace of the legiti�cy of my concera, John Kysylyczyn has on numeraus occasioos eefused to answer the question on whether he a�ccepted campaign money from anyone involved wtth the Cub Food proJect at Aar Mar. �rther Joha Kysylyczyn registered as a L�bbyist on 7/10/2000. Since he nodfled no ane with the c3ty that he was registering ss a lobbyist, and stnce elected oi'ffdala of statutory Clstss B dtfes itce euplkidp exempt from tl�e need for lobbying, 1 have to wonder who he is Iobbyiog for - the citizens nf Roseville or some unlmown entity.