My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_1211_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_1211_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 2:29:45 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes — 11/26/0 1 <br />Copy Page 3 <br />Roger Hess, resident, spoke against the variance. Frank Hess, 1907 <br />Shady Beach, spoke against the variance. Daniel Shieley, 190 1 <br />Shady Beach, spoke against the variance based on materials handed <br />out to Council Members and the public. Kysylyczyn, Goedeke, and <br />Maschka sought clarification about the sequence of events. <br />Kathleen Crea, resident, spoke about her memory of the fence <br />construction. Klausing commented on the tests for a variance and <br />suggested a hardship had not been shown. Kysylyczyn asked about <br />using Dispute Resolution, Inc. <br />The Council then turned to the backyard fence issue involving the <br />stretch of fencing down to the lake. Maschka commented on his <br />concerns about such fence structures under the City's Shoreland <br />Ordinance. Jamnik described the DNR position on Roseville's <br />Shoreland Ordinance. Goedeke noted the significant visual impact <br />of large fences on the lake. Patricia Johnson, resident, commented <br />on the purposes of the Shoreland Ordinance. Applicant Hoff <br />described his replacement of the pre-existing wooden fence with a <br />similarly sized vinyl fence. Kysylyczyn closed the public hearing. <br />Maschka moved, Mastel seconded, to continue this Variance <br />Request for 60 days, and to instruct staff to take this matter to <br />Dispute Resolution, Inc., and involve, if possible, a11 affected <br />persons. Roll Ca11, Ayes: Maschka, Mastel, Goedeke, Klausing and <br />Kysylyczyn. Nays: None. <br />At the ca11 of the Mayor, Kysylyczyn announced a recess at 9:20 <br />p.m. Kysylyczyn called the meeting to order again at 9:35 p.m. <br />I-2 Maschka moved, Goedeke seconded, to send this issue back to the <br />Planning Commission to study and recommend possible changes to <br />the City Code, Section 10 16 - Shoreland regulations, regarding the <br />placement of structures and fences near lake shores. Roll Ca11, <br />Ayes: Maschka, Mastel, Goedeke, Klausing and Kysylyczyn. Nays: <br />None. <br />E. Organizational Business <br />Recess <br />Shoreland Ordinance <br />Request for Review & <br />Consideration of an <br />Amendment to <br />Section 1016 <br />E-1 Maschka and Kysylyczyn recused themselves. Maschka and Jamnik Ethics Commission <br />left the dais and the Council chambers. Mastel presided as Acting Findings <br />Mayor. Richard Lambert <br />Complaint <br />Connie Pease, Chairperson of the Ethics Commission, summarized <br />the findings and recommendations of the Ethics Commission. <br />Klausing asked what provisions of the Ethics Resolution were at <br />issue. Klausing also asked about the burden of proof in Ethics <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.