2002_0107_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Council as the governing body for the city versus tYie role of the Mayor as a member of that Council and as the presider at Council meetings. If Council Members disagree among themselves about any of these dividing lines under a Plan B form of government between Council policy issues and Staff administrative issues, or between the Mayor's role as presiding officer at Council meetings and the Council's role as the governing body, then I suggest the Council seek the advice of a Minnesota licensed attorney (presumably our City Attorney), the League of Minr�esota Cities, or both. 2. Council Standing Rules of Procedure. Call me dull, but I expect City Council Standing Rules of Procedure to e�lain how a City Council proposes to organize its public meeting process. Certainly, how the Council proposes to organize its public meeting process is an important part of the Council's work. Consistent with this emphasis on a meeting process, City Council Standing Rules of Procedure deal with such issues as • the prerogatives of the Presiding Officer at council meetings (recognizing speakers, allotting time for speakers, clarifying what motion is before the body, determining and announcing the vote on each motion, etc.), • how other Council Members appeal procedural rulings of the Presiding Officer at meetings or how Council Members go about reconsidering their vote on an issue, • describes the nature of various kinds of Council meetings (regular meetings, special meetings, executive sessions, etc.), • describes the order of business that will be followed at Council meetings, • the start and ending times for meetings, • and similar issues involving City Council meeting procedures. The Council Member Elect's proposed standing rules of procedure do deal in large part with meeting procedures but then address what seem to be subjects other than City Council meeting procedures. For example, as noted above, the proposed rules address the alloca.tion of city office space, city purchasing, employee travel, employee grievances and various other non-meeting issues. Even assuming these subjects have a policy component worthy of Council consideration [see above), City Council Standing Rules of Procedure would seem not to be the place to address them. As a practical matter, I don't imagine anyone would think to look in the City Council's Standing Rules of Procedure to find out about employee travel, employee grievances, or the allocation of City office space. 3