My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0114_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0114_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 12:12:50 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:45:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Highway 280 and Broadway Interchange <br />Comparison of Alternates <br />January 10, 2002 <br />SEH No. A-ROSEV0201 .00 <br />Three separate alternate concepts have been developed for a potential interchange at Highway <br />280 and Broadway. These include the Central Alternate which is a concept which retains the <br />Highway 280 lanes in their e�sting location. The East Alternative moves the lanes to the east <br />and essentially takes most needed right-of-way from the northeast and southeast quadrants. The <br />West Alternate moves the roadway to the west and takes significant amounts for right-of-way in <br />the northwest and southwest quadrants. Each of the alternates has advantages and disadvantages <br />and a comparison of the three against some of the design and operating considerations presented <br />in the following paragraphs. Copies of the three alternates are attached. <br />TH 280 Alignment <br />The existing alignment of Highway 280 through the Broadway area consists of a reverse curve. <br />The e�sting alignment has a design speed of between 55 and 60 mph. Moving the roadway to <br />the east reduces the degree of curvature and improves the smoothness of the flow of traffic. <br />Shifting the roadway to the west requires introduction of a third curve for the roadway which <br />means, as an example, that northbound traffic would first curve slightly to the left, then, to the <br />right and ultimately to the left again. However, the degree of curvature would a11ow retention of <br />a 55 mph speed limit, but the operation would be less desirable. <br />Ramp Alignment <br />A design consideration is how the exit from a freeway occurs in terms of the impact on through <br />motorists. As an example, an exit on the outside of a curve on a freeway tends to draw through <br />traffic towards the e�t because of the additional pavement. Curves or reverse curves on ramps <br />sometimes create operational problems. The entrance from an on ramp also needs to have a <br />smooth flow since merging traffic must pay attention not to its roadway path but to the <br />approaching traffic. <br />The Central Alternate and the East Alternate both have the e�ts on either a tangent or an inside <br />curve section which will ha�e no problems for through traffic. The West Alternate does place <br />the northbound e�t on the outside of a curve. The Central Alternate has very sma11 curves on its <br />ramps. The East Alternate has 4 to 5 degree curves but there is a significant tangent section <br />between them. The West Alternate has 6 to 8 degree curves with a relatively short tangent <br />section. <br />The Central and East Alternates ha�e the entrance ramp entering the main line on either a tangent <br />or the outside of a curve. The West Alternate has the northbound entrance ramp on the outside <br />of a curve but the southbound entrance ramp on the inside of a curve which is less desirable. <br />Broadway Street Design <br />A major concern for design of Broadway is the distance between the railroad track and the ramp <br />intersection. The railroad tracks will ha�e a fixed elevation and require a flat grade across them <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.