Laserfiche WebLink
2. Refund: All fees sha11 be paid into the General Fund of the City. Upon rejection of any <br />application for a license or upon the withdrawal of the application before approval of the <br />issuance by the City Council, the license fee sha11 be refunded to the applicant except <br />where the rejection is for willful misstatement on the license application. <br />Probation: The fee for on sale intoxicating liquor and on sale wine licenses granted after <br />the commencement of the license year shall be prorated on a monthly basis. The fee for <br />on sale noninto�cating malt liquor licenses granted after the commencement of the <br />license year shall be prorated on a quarterly basis. <br />4. Investigation: At the time of each original application for a license, except special club, <br />on sale noninto�cating malt liquor and off sale noninto�cating malt liquor licenses, the <br />applicant sha11 pay, in full, an investigation fee. The investigation fee sha11 be three <br />hundred ($300.00) dollars. No investigation fee shall be refunded. (Ord. 972, 5-13-1985; <br />amd. 1995 Code) <br />Section 2. Section 302.15 of the Roseville City Code is amended to read as follows: <br />302.15: C1VIL PENALTY: <br />A. Penalty for Noncompliance: In addition to any criminal penalties which may be imposed <br />by a court of law, the city council may suspend a license for up to si�ty (60) days, may <br />revoke a license and/or may impose a civil fine on a licensee not to exceed two thousand <br />($2,000.00) dollars for each violation on a finding that the license holder or its employee <br />has failed to comply with a statute, rule or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages, <br />noninto�cating malt liquor or wine. <br />B. Presumptive Civil �1�'t�-Penalty: The purpose of this section is to establish a <br />standard by which the city council determines the length of license suspensions and the <br />propriety of revocations, and shall apply to a11 premises licensed under this chapter. <br />These penalties are presumed to be appropriate for every case; however, the council may <br />deviate in an individual case where the council finds that there e�st substantial reasons <br />making it more appropriate to deviate, such as, but not limited to, a licensee's efforts in <br />combination with the state or city to prevent the sale of alcohol to minors or, in the <br />converse, when a licensee has a history or repeated violations of state or local liquor <br />laws. When deviating from these standards, the council will provide written findings that <br />support the penalty selected. In a11 situations the Citv Council sha11 determine the <br />commencement date of the suspension. <br />1. Presumptive Penalties for violations for license holders who participate in the optional <br />mana�er and server trainin� and prove the person who committed the violation had <br />received CitY a�roved alcohol bevera�e server trainin� within the previous year are <br />listed below. Unless specified, numbers below indicate consecutive da�s suspension. <br />98288 <br />