My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0304_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0304_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:44:55 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:46:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council NTinutes — <br />O1/28/02 Page 4 <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an underlying <br />zoning of Single Fam�ly Residential (R-1). Roll Call, <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Maschka, Kough, Klausing and <br />Kysylyczyn. Nays: none. <br />Kysylyczyn moved, Kough seconded, to approve the <br />General Concept Plan of this Planned Unit Development <br />and the prelitninary plat for the development of the 2.25 <br />acre parcel into seven single family residential homes <br />subdivided under the Community In Common (CIC) plat <br />format, subject to the conditions listed in Section 3.2 to <br />3.7 of the project report dated January 28, 2002. Roll <br />Call, Ayes: Schroeder, Maschka, Kough, Klausing and <br />Kysylyczyn. Nays: none. <br />It is understood that the effective date of such a Planned <br />Unit Development will not occi��'u��il' after the <br />application submission and final approval of the Final <br />Development Plan, Final Plat, a Planned Unit <br />Development Agreement, and second reading of an <br />ordinance rezoning the parcel/publication of the PUD <br />ordinance. No new construction may occur before the <br />effective date of the ordinance. <br />IV. Land Use <br />V. Reports & Recommendations <br />A. Consider Adopting City Sponsorship Policy Sponsorship Policy <br />Bierscheid reviewed this proposed Council Policy. <br />Schroeder asked about signage:�i:t�j���lyczyn asked about <br />sharing of revenues and location of signs. Kough asked <br />about the location of signs and the amount of revenue to <br />be raised under this policy. <br />Kysylyczyn moved, Schroeder seconded, adoption of the <br />Sponsorship Policy deleting # 11. <br />Discussion ensued. <br />Klausing moved, Maschka seconded, to amend the <br />motion to adopt the Sponsorship Policy including # 11. <br />,1i;� p � ,:+.r: s,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.