My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0506_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0506_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 4:03:59 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:47:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
need to be higher. My personal preference would be to develop a policy <br />around first option. I hope this memo is of assistance to the council as <br />you continue to review Roseville's current assessment policy. <br />Sincerely <br />James A Mulder <br />1880 Shady Beach <br />Roseville <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: neal.beets@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />[mailto:neal.beets�ci.roseville.mn.us] <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:53 PM <br />To: JMulder�mncounties.org <br />Subject: RE: City Assessment <br />Jim, as with your election comments, for some reason the message to me does <br />not contain your assessment comments. Maybe it is a problem on my end? Neal <br />PS. Like the odd-even election issue, I anticipate the assessment issue <br />will be discussed at our May 6 meeting. May 6 is 4 weeks from our last <br />discussion of assessments; staff committed then to return in 4 weeks with an <br />analysis and options; we intend to keep that commitment. Neal <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Jim Mulder [mailto:JMulder�mncounties.org] <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:48 AM <br />To: 'neal.beets�ci.roseville.mn.us' <br />Subject: City Assessment <br />Neal: This is a copy of the memo I sent to the Mayor and Council. I hope <br />it will contribute to the debate. Jim Mulder <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.