Laserfiche WebLink
need to be higher. My personal preference would be to develop a policy <br />around first option. I hope this memo is of assistance to the council as <br />you continue to review Roseville's current assessment policy. <br />Sincerely <br />James A Mulder <br />1880 Shady Beach <br />Roseville <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: neal.beets@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />[mailto:neal.beets�ci.roseville.mn.us] <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:53 PM <br />To: JMulder�mncounties.org <br />Subject: RE: City Assessment <br />Jim, as with your election comments, for some reason the message to me does <br />not contain your assessment comments. Maybe it is a problem on my end? Neal <br />PS. Like the odd-even election issue, I anticipate the assessment issue <br />will be discussed at our May 6 meeting. May 6 is 4 weeks from our last <br />discussion of assessments; staff committed then to return in 4 weeks with an <br />analysis and options; we intend to keep that commitment. Neal <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Jim Mulder [mailto:JMulder�mncounties.org] <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:48 AM <br />To: 'neal.beets�ci.roseville.mn.us' <br />Subject: City Assessment <br />Neal: This is a copy of the memo I sent to the Mayor and Council. I hope <br />it will contribute to the debate. Jim Mulder <br />