Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: OS/06/02 <br />Item No: V�z . A. <br />Section: <br />ORDINANCES <br />Item Description: Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter 10, Sections 1005 and 1002 and <br />adding Section 1017 to the City Code by Adding Regulations relating to <br />Se�ually Oriented Business Uses (PF3394) <br />1.0 BACKGROUND <br />1.1 Currently the City of Roseville does not ha�e any Code regulations relating to se�ually <br />oriented business uses in the City, other than through minimal regulation in the licensing of <br />liquor establishments. <br />1.2 According to a State Attorney General's Report, neighborhoods located near se�ually <br />oriented businesses experienced increased transience and decreased stability of ownership. <br />2.0 HISTORY OF PROJECT <br />April 22, 2002 — Council approved interim ordinance applicable to 7uly 2002 <br />May 1, 2002 -� Planning Commission held hearing created findings of fact, recommended <br />ordinance (6-0) <br />May 6, 2002 — Council findings and first reading <br />May 13, 2002 expected Council second reading <br />3. 0 STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />3.1 Due to recent changes in technology, court cases and business practices concern has been <br />expressed about the minimal regulation in the City Code as well as the lack of other <br />official controls adequate in scope to accomplish preservation of the City's standards. <br />3.2 An Interim Ordinance creating a moratorium on establishment of new se�ually oriented <br />businesses was adopted by the City Council on April 22, 2002 to a11ow time for Planning <br />Commission and Council review of the facts and creation of regulations. This moratorium <br />expires in July 2002. <br />3.3 The City Attorney and Staff are recommending that the Planning Commission and <br />Council: 1) study the facts and adopt a resolution of findings of fact, and 2) adopt an <br />ordinance (attached) for the purpose of defining the use and regulating the location of <br />se�ually oriented businesses in "B" and "P' zones. Separation from any residential zone <br />or `B-1" zone (which may include residential units) would be required. <br />3.4 On May l, 2002, the Planning Commission held the required hearing to amend the City <br />PF3394 RCA •• ORDINANCE 050602 Page 1 <br />