My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0610_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0610_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 3:14:05 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:47:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: 06/lp/02 <br />ITEM NO: III. A. <br />Departme t Ap roval: Mana r proved: Agenda Section: <br />HEARINGS <br />tem eSCription: Hearing for Property Abatement: 2154 Lexington Avenue, <br />(vacant Jiffy Gas Station) <br />1.0 BACKGROUND <br />1.1 Periodically the Community Development staff reviews Code violations relating to property <br />maintenance to determine whether there are properties in disrepair for extended periods. The <br />staff spends time attempting to gain voluntary compliance during the year on these properties. <br />Generally, they have not met the Code because the owner has been absent, unable (physically or <br />financially), or unwilling to comply with the Code. Property abatement is one remedy. It <br />allows the City to order corrections and assess the property for the work. This process has <br />been used in previous years to secure buildings from vandals and weather, clean up buildings, <br />paint and/or restore siding, plug rodent holes, repair windows and fi� failing garage roofs and <br />doors. <br />1.2 The staff attempts to work with property owners to bring the structure into compliance (and <br />continues to encourage property owners to repair properties up to the time of a Council hearing). <br />The hearing is an opportunity for the property owners to address the property repair issues, <br />estimated costs of repair, and suggest altematives to the abatement process. The process is <br />attached. <br />1.3 The City goals within the comprehensive plan are protect and improve property values (Goals <br />3,4, and 5; page 6 and 7, Section 3) and to adhere to performance standards which protect the <br />integrity of commercial areas and neighborhoods (Policy 6, page 8, Section 3). <br />1.4 The conditions that prompted the abatement action (and the recent repairs completed by <br />the properiy owner) include: <br />o The gas station property is vacant and closed. <br />o Light panels are broken and missing <br />✓ On May 27th some panels were replaced; however, the <br />replacements were old, damaged panels from other buildings and <br />still constitute a nuisance violation (407.02j & K) because of their <br />condition. <br />✓ <br />o Doors are not secured. <br />✓ On May 27� the doors were secured. <br />o Entire structure is in need of painting due to peeling paint. <br />o The site is littered with pallets, tires, fencing a broken cabinet and <br />other debris. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.