Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />Bruce Carlson, Northco Real Estate Services, expressed concerns with flexibilitv <br />for continued uses and e�sting tenants; and is supportive of plan and vision and <br />may be interested in future development of the area. Within Twin Lakes Northco <br />owns 440,000 sq.ft., 32% of tenants are conforming. The remodeling of <br />buildings for tenants may be dif�cult. Office developers may not be possible at <br />this time, but "office" will revive itself over time. Could the Planning <br />Commission make a"business-friendly" policy statement? <br />Member Mulder asked Mr. Carlson for clarification of short-term revenue versus <br />long-term value of the site. At what point in time will some of the uses move out <br />of the Twin Lakes area. The current uses should remain and be successful, but <br />the next new use must adhere to the B-6 zoning district. <br />Member Cunningham asked if non-conforming use could expand the office use. <br />(Yes) <br />Rick Jolley, 1990 Brenner Avenue, expressed concern about the concept of wide <br />ranging B-6, noting "Housing" abutting Brenner Avenue is not specific enough. <br />Member Mulder responded that a key is that uses will eventually transition to <br />multi-family housing. <br />Member Cunningham noted <br />Could the zoning (B-6) be <br />family and buffering? <br />the importance of buffers within each development. <br />strengthened to include new language requiring multi- <br />Mr. Jolley asked if there was an opportunity to change the language in B-6 <br />zoning district text before adoption of this Code. (The Comprehensive Plan also <br />makes mention of the buffering and multi-family.) <br />Sean Regan, representing Regor Properties and the Fruehoff and UMADCO <br />buildings along County Road "C" and west of Byerlys. NIr. Regan stated his <br />property is closer to redevelopment than others. His property was retail at one <br />point in time. He estimated that none of his tenants would comply with the new <br />zoning; but want to work with the City on new uses. His property is designated <br />for "Hi-Tech" and "Hi-Flex". <br />Chair Duncan explained that a non-conforming use might replace a non- <br />conforming use. <br />No further comment was offered. Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br />Molti�an by Member Mulder, seconded by Member Bakeman, to <br />recommend approval to rezone from an existing mix of Industrial (I-1, I-2), <br />Business (B-4, B-1) and Residential (R-1) land use zones to Mixed Use <br />Business Park District (B-6) for all the parcels located within the Twin <br />Lakes Master Plan area as identified on the attached legal description, based <br />on findings in Section 4 and 5 of the project report dated June 5, 2002. <br />Member Mulder explained the need to keep communication open with property <br />owners. <br />