Laserfiche WebLink
Department <br />REQUEST FORCOUNCILACTION <br />Date: 8/12/20�2 <br />Item No: VIII. C. <br />Manager Approved: Agenda Section: <br />Consent <br />Item Description: Amending the 2001 Budget <br />Introduction <br />The City annually adopts budgets on the basis set forth by State Statute, and generally accepted accounting <br />principles. Although the City adopts a single a11-encompassing budget, additional measures are necessary <br />to show that a11 expenditures within the General Fund and certain Special Purpose Funds are within budget <br />appropriations, when presented in the financial statements. <br />The legal level of budgetary control (i.e. the level at which expenditures may not legally exceed <br />appropriations) has been established at the fund level, not line-item or individual programs. It is <br />recognized that the City's Department Heads, under the approval of the City Manager, may make transfers <br />of appropriations within the department. However, if the expenditures exceed the total fund budget, a <br />budget amendment must be shown. <br />It's worth noting, that these types of year-end adjustments are typical for cities like Roseville given the size <br />and scope of operations. Rather than make numerous budget adjustments throughout the year and incur the <br />significant administrative costs of monitoring the budget on a daily basis, it has become customary to <br />reflect the changes in one a11-encompassing adjustment. The year-end budget adjustments typically reflect <br />additional costs that are covered by unbudgeted grants, fees, or other revenues. <br />Discussion Items <br />The following budget amendment to the 2001 General Fund Budget is to be considered: <br />❑$44,660, to reflect the costs associated with the COPS in School Program (The School District <br />reimbursed the City for $30,000, resulting in a net cost of $14,660 to the City) <br />❑$50,951, to reflect the costs associated with various supplemental public safety awareness and crime <br />impact teams, including D.A.R.E., alcohol compliance checks, DWI enforcement, and auto theft. <br />These costs were offset by grants. <br />The costs noted above were not included in the original budget, but are reported in the year-end financial <br />statements. These programs are typically omitted from the budget due to the uncertainty of grant funding. <br />The programs are initiated once it has been determined that grant funding is available. The budget <br />amendments to the General Fund are provided for by additional federal, state, and local grant monies <br />totaling appro�mately $80,000, along with additional budget savings from other programs. <br />