Laserfiche WebLink
Option 1 <br />Current <br />System <br />Option 2 <br />�Veekly <br />Collection <br />Option 3 <br />Single <br />Stream <br />Pros <br />-Residents are familiar with it <br />-Less residual and out throw <br />-Lower processing cost <br />-Bins can be modified to add <br />lids and wheels <br />-Lowest cost ($2.05 per <br />household, per month) <br />-Abates storage concerns because <br />of less build up <br />-Less residual and out throws <br />cons <br />-Participation rates and tonnages <br />are stagnant <br />-Higher collection cost <br />-Difficulty of getting bins to the <br />curb <br />-Storage concerns inhibiting full <br />participation <br />-Dif�iculty getting bins to curb <br />-Higher collection cost <br />-Less convenient <br />-Lower processing cost <br />-Increased truck trafflc <br />-Bins can be modified to add lids <br />and wheels -88% of residents surveyed said <br />every other week collection is OfteI1 <br />enough <br />-Higher Cost ($2.10-2.25 per house- <br />hold, per month) <br />-Convenient (no sorting) -Higher cost of processing <br />-Wheeled and covered containers -Higher residual and out throw rates <br />-Lower cost of collection -Only one vendor <br />-Provides additional storage space -If City doesn't own bins, would <br />have to buy a new set if new vendor <br />-Less truck traffic because trucks <br />don't fill as quickly since they can -Waste Management has less incen- <br />compact material tive to recover glass and sell it to a <br />manufacturer for recycling <br />-Higher participation/ More ton- <br />nage collected -Residents surveyed split 50/50 on <br />whether they want it <br />-Highest cost ($2.25 per household <br />per month) <br />63 <br />