Laserfiche WebLink
wetland restoration and improvement plan, for which the Watershed did not indicate any <br />objection to the ten foot principal structure wetland setback A number of adjacent <br />property owners addressed the Commission indicating their support for the Brucciani — <br />Horvath variance request. <br />7.2 The City Planner, based on concerns by some Commissioners, did offer to discuss <br />additional planting between the home and wetland to create a more fortified buffer strip <br />and add the landscaping to the conditions of approval. <br />7.3 The Planning Commission recommend approval (5-0) of a 40 foot variance to Section <br />1016.16A (Structure Design Standards) of the Roseville City Code for Tim & Marcia <br />Brucciani — Horvath, to allow construction of a principal structure, attached garage and <br />other site improvements on the vacant parcel lying on the south side of North Gluek <br />Lane, based on the findings in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report <br />dated October 2, 2002 (includes additional condition pertaining to buffer strip <br />landscaping). <br />8.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: <br />8.1 Adopt a resolution granting a 40 foot variance to Section 1016.16A (Structure <br />Design Standards) of the Roseville City Code for Tim & Marcia Brucciani — <br />Horvath, to allow construction of a principal structure, attached garage and other <br />site improvements on the vacant parcel lying on the south side of North Gluek Lane, <br />based on the findings in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report <br />dated October 21, 2002. <br />Prepared by. Thomas Paschke (65 1-490-2236) <br />Attachments: Location map, narrative, site plan, aerial photo. <br />PF343 1• RCA 102102 � Page 5 of 5 <br />