2002_1021_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

D RAFT EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 21st day of October, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO SECTION 1016.1GA (STRUCTURE DESIGN STANDARDS) OF THE ROSEVII,LE CITY CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG NORTH GLUEK LANE (PF 3431). 13.5 foot variance to Section 1004.02D4 (Side Yard setback Adjacent a Public Street) to allow construction of certain home improvements and an attached garage to the principal structure at 3 88 South McCarrons Boulevard. WHEREAS, Timothy and Marsha Brucciani-Horvath ha�e requested a variance to Section 1016.16A (Structure Design Standards) in order to construct a home on their vacant lot along North Gluek Lane; and WHEREAS, the Brucciani-Horvath parcel is located on the south side of North Gluek Lane (unaddressed) and legally described at as: That part of Lot 1, Block 2 Midway Acres; lying westerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point of the north line of said Lot 1, distant 182 feet easterly of the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence southerly a distance of 190.46 feet to a point of the southeasterly line of said Lot I, distant 184.38 feet northeasterly of the southwest corner of said Lot I, and there terminating. PID Number: 09-29-23-34-0029 WHEREAS, Section 1016.16A requires a minimum setback from a wetland of 50 feet; and WHEREAS, Brucciani-Horvath proposal desires to construct their home on the lot they purchased in 1985 10 feet from the newly established wetland delineation boundary; and WHEREAS, the placement of the principal structure and attached garage requires a 40 foot variance to Section 1016.16A of the Roseville City Code; and WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Brucciani-Horvath variance request on October 2, 2002, and recommended (5-O) approval of the request, based on findings outlined in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated October 2, 2002.