My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_1021_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_1021_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 10:00:31 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:49:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.0 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE & ROSEVILLE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING <br />POLICY <br />4.1 Throughout the master plan process it has been assumed that the redevelopment of <br />Twin Lakes could not successfully be achieved "but for" the use of public assistance; <br />Roseville has concentrated its assistance on preparation of the land for redevelopment <br />and counted on the private sector to design, build, own, and operate the structures. <br />4.2 The fiscal challenges of land assembly, business relocation, and razing of blighted <br />buildings, along with environmental, infrastructure, neighborhood and market forces <br />will require creativity, commitment and perseverance (time!) from a11 public funding <br />partners but most importantly from the local community. The local benefits from <br />redevelopment such as increased tax dollars, improved quality of life, improved <br />environmental resources and quality jobs and new housing opportunities must <br />continue to be part of the shared vision of the policy makers and community as the <br />process moves forward. Staff has been working throughout the years to keep possible <br />funding agencies informed on the redevelopment challenges and potential impacts of <br />Twin Lakes - redevelopment of this magnitude is a challenge that no one entity can <br />successfully address. <br />4.3 Roseville's current Tax Increment Policy was written at a time when the comple�ties <br />of large scale redevelopment were not anticipated. The policy has not been revised to <br />address changes in the tax law which reduces its impact on redevelopment projects. <br />Although the policy is well written and conservative in its approach to site by site <br />redevelopment, portions of the policy may need to be reconsidered in achieving the <br />goals of major redevelopment within Twin Lakes. The following are portions of the <br />existing Tax Increment Policy that the Council should consider as proposals for Twin <br />Lakes are reviewed now and in the future. <br />CI' icrent olic Su estedNeed for Change <br />District Terms 10 years Initial fiscal studies, using the maximum <br />densities, indicated that payback to "level the <br />playing field" as vacant land can not be <br />achieved within 10 vears. <br />Type of Payback Pay-as-you-go only There may be a need to provide up front <br />assistance due to the large infrastructure <br />investment required. All excess tax increment <br />funds sa�ed for construction of Twin Lakes <br />Parkway have been depleted due to changes in <br />the tax law in 2001 and close out of districts. A <br />portion of the Twin Lakes site (Indianhead site) <br />in no longer within any district. <br />PF3232 — RCD — RP Proposal (102102) Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.