Laserfiche WebLink
Beets, Neal <br />From: Beets, Neal <br />Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:41 PM <br />To: Greg Schroeder (gregschroeder@attbi.com) <br />cc: ''RV Council <br />Subject: RE: Attorney fees <br />Greg (and all), here are my answers to your questions: <br />"1) Do they (lets use Cambell Knutson for example) get a flat fee say up to $8,500 and anything above that they <br />get $125/hour if a partner is used?? or do they bill on an hourly basis up to the flat monthly fee of $8,500??" <br />First, all firms want to negotiate over the billing arrangement. Next, No, that is not how it works. All the firms have <br />offered a proposed or estimated flat fee that we would pay every month that covers certain legal services <br />regardless of few or how many hours the law firm spends providing those services, and then the law firm would <br />bill hourly for services not covered by the flat fee. As an alternative, all the law firms have also offered to simply <br />bill hourly for all legal services they provide. <br />The theory of the flat fee or retainer is that the customer, us, is better off buying legal services, such as all city <br />attorney services, rather than paying for time, such as hourly billing. Put another way, we are buying a car rather <br />paying for each car part individually. The flat fee benefits the law firm because they know they will make $X <br />dollars, even in a month that is light on hours worked. For these reasons, flat fees tend to reflect a discount from <br />an hourly billing arrangement and tend to be a better deal for the customer IF the legal services included in the flat <br />fee are comprehensive and IF the flat fee is set at the right amount that saves the customer some money without <br />putting undue stress on the law firm. <br />Using your example of Campbell Knutson, they offer to provide all non-litigation city attorney services that the <br />City needs for a flat monthly fee of $8,500, regardless of whether in any particular month they attend a large <br />number of city meetings and put in an usually large number of hours of legal work researching issues or an <br />unusually small number of hours. The only thing they would bill for that is outside the flat fee would be defending <br />the city in a lawsuit. If we prefer, as an alternative Campbell Knutson would simply bill hourly for ail meetings <br />attended and all work performed, including litigation, at $125 per hour. <br />"2) How does this work with the other firms listed??" <br />2. The other firms work out this way: <br />Jensen Bell would provide some city attorney legal work for a flat fee of $4,800 per month; however, unlike <br />Campbell Knutson, whose flat fee covers all city meetings and all city attorney legal work other than <br />litigation, the Jensen Bell flat fee excludes real estate work (such as the Arona land sale agreement), <br />excludes "personnel or internal organization matters" (such as employee discipline issues or the Fire <br />Relief Association pension issue), excludes "special assessment work" (such as our lengthy consideration <br />of special assessment policies), and excludes attendance at Council "workshops." For these matters that <br />they exclude from their retainer Jensen Bell would charge $160 an hour in addition to receiving their <br />retainer. Alternatively, rather than a retainer/flat fee for certain services Jensen Bell would simply bill all <br />services at $160 per hour times however many hours they spend on city legal work. <br />b. Kennedy and Graven would provide some city attorney legal work for an "estimated" flat fee of $6,000 per <br />month; they say "estimated" because they ask in their proposal for a chance to get a better feel for how <br />many hours they may have to spend on Roseville's legal work and then they would refine and revise their <br />"estimated" flat fee. Again, unlike Campbell Knutson whose flat fee covers all city meetings and legal <br />work other than litigation, the Kennedy Graven flat fee excludes "development and redevelopmenY' work <br />(such as that related to Twin Lakes and Arona) and excludes "complex projects" (which is worrisome <br />because we don't know what KG may consider "complex.") For these matters that they exclude from their <br />retainer Kennedy Graven would charge $135 an hour. Alternatively, rather than a flat fee Kennedy Graven <br />would simply bill all legal services at $135 per hour times however many hours they spend on city legal <br />work. <br />c. Like Campbell Knutson, Ratwik, Roszak & Maloney would provide all city attorney legal work other than <br />litigation for a flat fee of $8,500 per month. <br />"3) I see one firm only lists a flat fee, does that mean we get more for the $8,500 than the other firms??" <br />3. Ratwik Roszak only lists a flat fee of $8,500 per month. I suspect, however, that if we prefer not to do a flat fee <br />arrangement and to be billed hourly for all the meetings and legal work they perform then Ratwik Roszak will do <br />