Laserfiche WebLink
September 30, 2002 <br />To: City Council <br />From: Joel J3mnik <br />Subject: Relief Association I?ligihility for Professional i�irc Pcrsonncl <br />Issue <br />Are professional (full-time) firefighters eligible far membership in �hc (Zclief Association? <br />Background <br />Minnesota still has the majority of its fire protection services providcti by volunteers. Whiic most <br />departments provide only nominal consideration for the srrviccs of tliese individuals, state law authorizes <br />the creation of nonprofit ie�1Cf associations that provide a pension bciic[it for volunteer firefighters. <br />Firefighters who are not volunteers (or(en referred to as "p�•���CS51t)n8�", "paid", "salaricd", °[ll��-htltc" or <br />various combinations thereo� are eligible far membership in the Public Employee's Retirement Association <br />(PERA). <br />GiVCiI the evolution of some fire departnlCnts to "combined" dcpar(ttients comprised of both volutttecrs and <br />paid firefighters, a legal question has becn raised regarding the eligibility of paid firefighters to become <br />members in relief associations. <br />The Office of State Auditor (OSA) and PF,R/� generally �t�ve taken the position that dual inembership in <br />two pension plans constitutes double credit for the same Service in contravention of state law. <br />However, while the PERA laws generally prevent using volunteer compensation and benefits as part of the <br />farmula for calculating state PERA pension benefits, no parallel prohibition exists far most relief <br />associations. Consequently, some paid or salaried firefighters have joined, or sought to join, local relief <br />associations. The firefighters within the Edina Fire Department are members of bothPERA and a local <br />relief association. In addition, the City of Hastings was involved in litigation regarding salaried firefighters <br />who sought service credit in the local relief association. While the court concluded that in these situations <br />dual pension benefits present an opportunity for "double dipping", it �C�t resolution of this potential <br />problem to the legislature and to local relief associations. As of this date the legislature has not responded, <br />leaving the matter primarily in the hands of local relief association officials. Further complicating matters <br />is that the Hastings case was not appealed, and so is not binding precedent. <br />Relief Associations face a tough task evaluating the problem and 11�cir unique local situations. <br />Different questions and policies are raised if the full-time firefighter is hourly rate or salaried, since <br />overtime compensation can affect PERA earnings reports. Questions of fairness and equity are raised when <br />the Department has salaried firefighters of its own and volunteers who also serve as paid firefighters in <br />other communities. Call-back, emergency response, and overtime policies of departments affect the <br />analysis, as does the eligibility and service credit formulas of the relief associations. <br />The OSA and PERA positions remain opposed to dual eligibility, and local relief association officials must <br />consider potential state action (such as withholding state pension aid) in fashioning a response. There jg <br />also the possibility of additional lawsuits depending on what actions they take, or if they fail to act. <br />At this time, there is no safe harbor. <br />