My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2010 11:31:42 AM
Creation date
11/22/2010 11:31:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/25/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 25, 2010 <br /> Page 17 <br /> In response to Councilmember Ihlan, Mayor Klausing assured Councilmember Ih- <br /> lan and the public that he had heard her comments, as well as those comments and <br /> concerns expressed by the public. Mayor Klausing noted that those concerns will <br /> be addressed as part of a future land use application process, depending on the ac- <br /> tual request. <br /> Councilmember Roe noted that, while not every proposal in Roseville came be- <br /> fore the City Council, the City Council as Roseville's policy making body did <br /> establish land use parameters. Councilmember Roe noted this avoided proposals <br /> becoming politicized by the City Council body beyond those standards already in <br /> place. <br /> Mayor Klausing concurred, and further noted that code provisions were in place <br /> to address drainage concerns as expressed during public comment. <br /> Councilmember Pust noted that the City Council couldn't predict a future propos- <br /> al at this time; and tonight's decision needed to be separate from a future devel- <br /> opment proposal. Councilmember Pust questioned what could be done about ex- <br /> isting problems at this intersection today; and suggested staff be directed to work <br /> jointly with St. Anthony to consider safety issues. <br /> Public Works Director Schwartz confirmed that the intersection was jointly admi- <br /> nistered by both the City of Roseville and St. Anthony Village; and advised that <br /> staff could review to see if it warranted a signal or round- about. <br /> By consensus, Mayor Klausing directed staff to perform a comprehensive review <br /> and history of that intersection; and to make that review public information. <br /> No action was taken to change land use designation from HDR. <br /> e. Consider Corrections /Amendments and Rezoning of Approximately 16 Par- <br /> cels to be Consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly reviewed the 16 anomaly properties as de- <br /> tailed in the RCA dated October 25, 2010; and the recent Open House, as well as <br /> the Public Hearing held at the Planning Commission level. <br /> Councilmember Roe followed up on previous e-mails to staff on the two Minne- <br /> sota Commercial railroad properties (Slides #11 and #14) that recommended <br /> changes from designation of Railroad Right -of -Way to industrial and Commercial <br /> to Industrial respectively and staff's rationale for those recommendations. <br /> Mr. Paschke reviewed adjacent properties and guidance of those parcels similar to <br /> recommendations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.