CC_Minutes_2010_1025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 25, 2010 Page 18 Discussion included the number of parcels identified during this comprehensive zoning review; rationale in recommended designations; with Councilmembers concurring that the parcel identified in Slide #14 be removed for further consider- ation of its designation. Mr. Paschke noted that this action required a super- majority vote. Klausing moved, Pust seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 10855 (Attachment C) entitled, "A Resolution Amending Roseville's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, amended to correct 15 parcels; eliminating the Parcel on Slide #14. Roll Call Ayes: Johnson; Roe; Ihlan; Pust; and Klausing. Nays: None. Recess Mayor Klausing recessed the meeting at approximately 8:38 p.m. and reconvened at approx- imately 8:44 p.m. 13. Business Items Presentations/Discussions a. Discuss 2011 Street Work Plan Public Works Director Duane Schwartz briefly summarized the 2011 Public works Work Plan as detailed in the RCA dated October 25, 2010. Mr. Schwartz noted cer- tain pavement failures from construction projects done in the 1990's and current stu- dies being performed on the materials used. Mr. Schwartz reviewed the PMP projects for mill and overlay, and reconstruction and their locations, funding sources and cost estimates; utility work for sanitary sewer lining and/or replacement; water main re- placement; and sealcoat or crack seal maintenance projects. Mr. Schwartz briefly reviewed projects of other jurisdictions affecting the City of Roseville, including Rice Street improvements Phase II for bridge and interchange replacement; and area watershed district projects impacting the City. Discussion among staff and Councilmembers included projections for anticipated construction bids continuing; upcoming feasibility report and pathway construction along Dale Street addressing safety concerns and pedestrian and bicycle traffic; re- ductions in interest earnings in the PMP and limited use of principal funds and reduc- tion in MSA allocations for street maintenance at approximately 1/3 of the City's needs. Further discussion included potential projects currently on hold and possibly put back into the work plan as bid alternates and depending on funding sources; and use of re- serves and loss of interest versus the minimal amount of interest currently being earned and long -term cost savings by doing projects at this time and in this bid cli- mate.