Laserfiche WebLink
December 14, 2010 <br /> Item 4B <br /> City Benefits <br /> December 7, 2010 <br /> To: Human Rights Commission <br /> Fr: Carolyn Curti, Human Rights Commission Staff Liaison <br /> Eldona Bacon, Human Resources Director <br /> Re: Domestic Partnership Registry <br /> There is currently nothing in our City policies or employee handbook that specifically identifies <br /> or addresses domestic partnerships. The State of Minnesota would have to take legislative action <br /> to allow a local government to offer domestic partner benefits. <br /> Roseville's City code has two places that address discrimination. <br /> 104.01: Purpose and Scope; Personnel Appointments <br /> K. Equal Employment Opportunity: <br /> 1. State and Federal Regulations: The city provides equal opportunity to all employees <br /> and applicants for employment in accordance with all applicable state and federal laws, <br /> directives and regulations. <br /> 2. Discrimination: Discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, place of <br /> residence, disability, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, sex, sexual <br /> orientation, veteran status, pregnancy, age or any other class protected by state or federal law is <br /> prohibited in all personnel policies, programs and practices. <br /> 3. Responsibility of City Manager: The city manager is responsible for implementing this <br /> policy. Failure of any city employee to act in a manner consistent with this policy may result in <br /> disciplinary action against that employee. (Ord. 1230, 8 -23 -1999) <br /> 1207.27: Nondiscrimination: <br /> The franchisee, its agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors shall at all times comply <br /> with the provision of the City of Roseville Code and applicable state and federal law regarding <br /> nondiscrimination and civil rights in connection with its services provided pursuant to this <br /> Franchise Ordinance. (Ord. 1324, 08 -08 -2005) <br /> Domestic Partner Registry <br /> Recently Maplewood and Golden Valley became the sixth and seventh cities to enact domestic <br /> partner registration ordinances in Minnesota <br /> Some argue that while domestic partner registries have limited legal effect, couples (different <br /> sex and same -sex) can document the existence of their relationship. This can help with securing <br /> benefits from employers, businesses, or others who wish to use the registration as the basis for <br /> doing so. Leaders and residents in the cities that have passed such a proposal have spoken about <br /> the positive message a partner ordinance sends about the welcoming, inclusive nature of the <br /> community. <br />