My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1115
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2010 12:20:59 PM
Creation date
12/14/2010 12:20:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/15/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, November 15, 2010 <br /> Page 21 <br /> City Manager Malinen advised that he was not expecting this problem next year, <br /> expressing hope that a positive refinement had finally been achieved. <br /> Councilmember Pust suggested that an additional column be inserted to provide a <br /> brief explanation of the major, flagged items. <br /> City Manager Malinen requested City Council discussion at tonight's meeting <br /> about their thoughts on, and to find consensus on, the relative size of the budget <br /> and consequent tax levy; and if that is the level desired or for less than the prelim- <br /> inary approval to allow staff to return on December 6, 2010 with recommended <br /> changes based on the City Council's priorities to achieve that desired tax levy. <br /> Councilmember Roe noted the City's receipt of over $1 million Tax Increment <br /> Financing (TIF) proceeds through close out of one of the TIF Districts; and <br /> opined that it would be appropriate to use a portion of those funds for one -time <br /> 2011 capital needs of the City. Councilmember Roe clarified that he was not <br /> supportive of using reserves for operating costs; however, he noted that the City's <br /> reserves had been increased due to the close out of the TIF District, and some of <br /> these proceeds could facilitate the $236,000 needed for CIP funding and thereby <br /> reduce the levy by that amount, but not the budget. <br /> Councilmember Roe moved to use the Tax Increment Financing close out <br /> funds to reduce the levy from the proposed $757,015 to $520,640; and reduce <br /> the proposed levy increase from 5.3% to 3.6 representing an approximate 1% <br /> property tax increase for the average household. <br /> Councilmember Pust suggested that, since the windfall was due to early payout of <br /> a TIF District, why not use the entire $1.1 million even if on operational ex- <br /> penses; questioning the rationale in building it back into reserves while raising <br /> taxes at the same time. <br /> City Manager Malinen reminded Councilmembers that the City's reserve levels <br /> were already 15% below the City Council- adopted policy level for General Fund <br /> reserve levels. <br /> Councilmember Pust recognized the need to build up reserves; however, she ques- <br /> tioned why if it was being used for CIP, the same argument couldn't be used for <br /> operational items and defer property tax increases by a significant amount. <br /> Mayor Klausing opined that there were good arguments for or against; but opined <br /> that recapturing those unexpected funds served to put the City's reserves less be- <br /> hind that they otherwise would be. <br /> Councilmember Pust opined that the City Council still had the authority to raise <br /> property taxes for 2012. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.