My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_1115
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_1115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2010 12:20:59 PM
Creation date
12/14/2010 12:20:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/15/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, November 15, 2010 <br /> Page 7 <br /> tials between each false alarm to provide incentives to improve behavior and re- <br /> duce repeat false alarms. <br /> Councilmembers concurred with City Manager Malinen's suggested language to <br /> specify a 12 month calendar rather than specifying a calendar year. <br /> Chief Mathwig requested time to verify with his record keeping staff that the sys- <br /> tem could accommodate that language, since it had always been operated on a ca- <br /> lendar year, and may be more cumbersome to apply a rolling time frame, depend- <br /> ing on how and when the annual system was purged. <br /> Lt. Rosand advised that it could be accommodated, but may prove more cumber- <br /> some for the department's record keeping staff. <br /> In order to allow the department to verify that information, Mayor Klausing sug- <br /> gested that this item be delayed until the next meeting on November 22, 2010. <br /> Councilmember Pust clarified that her idea of escalated fees was that there be a <br /> significant differential, not simply incremental. <br /> b. Consider Adoption of Street Light Utility Ordinance <br /> Public Works Director Duane Schwartz reviewed the RCA dated November 15, <br /> 2010; and revisions made to a proposed Street Light Utility Ordinance following <br /> previous public and City Councilmember comment at their August 23, 2010 pub- <br /> lic hearing on the matter. Mr. Schwartz advised that additional refinement of the <br /> proposed rate structure had been made by staff based on comments received from <br /> the public and City Council, allowing for a residential rate structure, with all other <br /> properties calculated on a per acre rate, and all billed on a quarterly basis as part <br /> of their utility billing. Mr. Schwartz noted that the rates mimicked the amount <br /> currently paid by taxpayers on their property taxes. Mr. Schwartz noted that the <br /> rate structure included repairs and energy costs, and addressed capital improve- <br /> ments for replacement of aging lighting systems. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Roe, Mr. Schwartz clarified that the fee in- <br /> cluded not just overhead street lights, but traffic signals, their maintenance, and <br /> utility costs for that equipment. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Lisa Peilen, Director of Municipal Affairs, Minnesota Multi- Housing Associ- <br /> ation, a state -wide, non profit trade association of rental property owners <br /> Ms. Peilen apologized for not being available to speak before and thanked the <br /> City Council for allowing her to do so at tonight's meeting. On behalf of member <br /> rental property owners in Roseville, Ms. Peilen spoke in opposition to the pro- <br /> posed rate structure for multi family residential properties in Roseville. While re- <br /> cognizing that everyone benefited from a strong and well- maintained City of <br /> Roseville, Ms. Peilen reviewed concerns of her member multi family property <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.