Laserfiche WebLink
Amendments to November 29, 2010 minutes <br /> Council Member Ihlan <br /> Page 4 lines 3 -8 Replace last two sentences of paragraph with the following: <br /> Councilmember Ihlan questioned Mr. Korstad on what evidence and arguments had been <br /> submitted to the City Council to show the proposed project met Conditional Use <br /> standards and Industrial Zoning District performance standards in the Roseville City <br /> Code. Councilmember Ihlan further clarified that based on the materials in the record <br /> and included in tonight's packet, the Conditional Use request for outdoor storage of <br /> materials was integrally related to and part of a proposed asphalt plant. <br /> Page 5 lines 11 -22 <br /> Change to Dick Klick <br /> Page 6 lines 33 -38 <br /> Correct name spelling to Bachhuber <br /> Page 7 lines 27 -44 <br /> Correct name spelling to Paul Zisla <br /> Page 9 lines 4 -10 Replace last two sentences of paragraph with the following: <br /> Councilmember Ihlan stated her interpretation that an asphalt plant was not a permitted <br /> use under the industrial zoning code existing at the time of the application, and agreed <br /> with the reasons outlined in Finding #7 on page 2 of the draft resolution. Councilmember <br /> Ihlan further opined that outdoor storage and crushing operations are both integral parts <br /> of the proposed asphalt plant operations. Councilmember Ihlan stated that based on <br /> evidence in the record, denial of the Conditional Use application for outdoor storage of <br /> aggregate materials also includes denial of the entire proposed asphalt plant. <br /> Page 9 lines 26 -28 Replace with the following: <br /> Councilmember Ihlan requested that the findings should include a description of the <br /> record being considered by the council, and that any additional evidence referenced in the <br /> findings be included in the record. <br /> Page 9 lines 42 -45 Replace first sentence of paragraph with the following: <br /> Councilmember Ihlan agreed with the findings detailed in the proposed resolution that the <br /> proposed asphalt plant operations would not meet the industrial performance standards in <br /> Section 1007.01D of the Roseville City Code. <br />