Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance, the outdoor storage of aggregates, the storage of materials in enclosed <br /> tanks and crushing operation activities are not permitted uses. Consequently, the <br /> Asphalt Plant proposed by Bituminous Roadways is not a permitted use in an I -2 <br /> Zoned District under Section 1007.015 of the Original Ordinance. <br /> 8. The use of the subject property for an Asphalt Plant is not a permitted use under <br /> the Performance Standards stated in Section 1007.01D of the Roseville City Code <br /> for the following reasons based upon evidence which has been presented to the <br /> City Council as well as the following specific sources: <br /> A. The proposed crushing operation as part of the asphalt plant proposal will <br /> create noise to a level constituting a nuisance to the surrounding area <br /> prohibited under 1007.01(D)(1) of the Roseville City Code, specifically at <br /> 2501 Walnut Street, a commercial office building, where the decibel levels <br /> will exceed the commercial daytime standards for noise under the State of <br /> Minnesota Pollution Control Agency noise standards, and at 2431 St. Croix <br /> Street, an industrial use, where the decibel levels of the alternative crusher <br /> will exceed the daytime industrial standards under the State of Minnesota <br /> Pollution Control Agency noise standards. (Source: Letter dated August 11, <br /> 2010 from Chris Massey, Vice President UC06 Roseville MN LLC, property <br /> owner of 2501 Walnut Street, Roseville; pgs. 3 -5 and attachments). <br /> B. The proposed asphalt plant proposal will emit particulate matter in such a <br /> manner that will constitute a nuisance to the surrounding area prohibited by <br /> Section 1007.01(D)(2) of the Roseville City Code. The draft air quality <br /> permit shows a potential emissions of 39.16 tons with half of these emissions <br /> being larger particulate matter that have the potential of settling on nearby <br /> surrounding properties and air intakes creating a nuisance for the building <br /> owner and tenants (Source: Letter dated September 10, 2010 from Joseph <br /> Maternowski, Moss and Barnet, representing UC06 Roseville MN LLC, <br /> property owner of 2501 Walnut Street, Roseville, pg 12 -13). <br /> C. The proposed asphalt plant proposal will emit particulate matter in a manner <br /> that will constitute a nuisance to the surrounding area prohibited under <br /> 1007.01(D)(2) of the Roseville City Code. Specifically, particulate matter <br /> known to cause respiratory and cardiovascular disease will be at the maximum <br /> emission level allowed under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards <br /> (NAAQS) as measured over a 24 -hour period. These emissions cause serious <br /> public health concerns for certain populations. Source: Letter dated <br /> September 10, 2010 from Joseph Maternowski, Moss and Barnet, representing <br /> UC06 Roseville MN LLC, property owner of 2501 Walnut Street, Roseville <br /> (pg. 11 -13). <br /> 3 <br />