My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-02-04_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-02-04_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2010 4:13:06 PM
Creation date
12/29/2010 4:12:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/4/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GRASS LAKE WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION FEBRUARY 4, 2010 <br />BWSR has posted a list of projects approved for funding in 2010. The GLWMO is listed as <br />funded at the full amount requested. He indicated that he would follow- up with BWSR to <br />determine if there are any long term reporting and /or maintenance costs that need to be <br />considered. He suggested that we should schedule a workshop for the Board to discuss the <br />implications of this opportunity before we make a final decision to accept (or not) this possible <br />funding. <br />Eckman pointed out that Roseville was providing some of the funding for this project, but <br />GLWMO would be the responsible fiscal agent. <br />Chair Ferrington indicated that no action was necessary on this item at this time. <br />B 2 Pervious Pavement Monitoring <br />Chair Ferrington asked Maloney to update the board on the status of the Pervious Pavement <br />Monitoring. Maloney described the project and explained that he is working with University of <br />Minnesota (Heinz Stephan graduate students) and the Minnesota Dept of Health to start using <br />the monitoring wells. Maloney indicated that he would be prepared at the next regular business <br />meeting to report on what the plan is for monitoring. Maloney made an open invite to anyone <br />that wants to use the data. Eckman asked who will be storing the data. Peterson indicated that <br />the RCD has had the data. There was some discussion on getting it posted to the website. <br />Peterson indicated that the RCD will be working on making the data more accessible. <br />B 3 Annual Report /Audit Requirements for 2009 <br />Chair Ferrington discussed the form and indicated so the <br />what is required by BWSR for annual reporting. Peterson noted that the annual report is due by <br />April 30, 2009. Peterson asked how audits are conducted. Bloom indicated that the GLWMO <br />audit is completed as a part of the annual city audit. The board discussed audit costs and moved <br />on to discuss the transition to RCD for providing administrative support. <br />B Development of 2011 Draft Budget (Timing how to plan) <br />The Board discussed the timing for the preparation of the 2011 budget. Both Maloney and <br />Bloom indicated that the Cities would need to have a firm budget nwm, ber from the Board by <br />May 1, 2010 for the City budget process. Chair Ferrington suggestaat,2011 budget be <br />discussed at a workshop before the April meeting. <br />B 5 RCD Cost Share Report (2008 2009) (10 min) <br />Ryan Johnson, RCD, summarized the information provided in the packet. Johnson indicated that <br />there are 2 shoreline projects and 3 rain garden projects to be constructed in GLWMO in 2010. <br />Chair Ferrington asked about timing for projects under design, and indicated the importance of <br />understanding the funding needs for the cost share program for the 2011 budget process. <br />Johnson indicated that additional money may be needed due to an increase in interest and <br />described the added cost of an expanded outreach/ education program. <br />B 6 Financial Report <br />The Board expressed concern about the format of the report and a desire to that the format be <br />revised to be more in keeping with the format that Ramsey- Washington had provided last year. <br />Chair Ii-ington thought that this format could be discussed at a workshop before the April <br />meeting. <br />B 7 Water Resources Minnegram <br />Manzara requested that we consider providing this communication as a website link vs. a paper <br />copy. The Board expressed support for starting to provide these newsletters as links in the future <br />2 <br />r <br />f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.