Laserfiche WebLink
<br />where Dellwood Avenue would be if it were constructed. It <br />drains through a small swale and is picked up in an existing <br />catch basin shown in green, crosses Josephine and goes out to <br />the lake. This is what is here today. To correct this flood- <br />ing, it is necessary to have greater capacity outlets. This <br />is the reason why the small 12 inch would be abandoned and a <br />27 inch pipe would replace it and a 30 inch pipe out to almost <br />the exact location of the outfall. No change in the location <br />would be in the outfall at the northern perimeter and catch <br />basins in the area to pick up the water (inaudible) and also <br />to provide for better drainage in the area and do a better job <br />of keeping our city streets in better shape. <br /> <br />In conclusion, as you see here, shaded in the brown, would <br />result in an expenditure of slightly over $200,000. In order <br />to get a handle as to just what the shape of the receiving body <br />is, which is Lake Josephine, and what sorts of water would be <br />coming to this area, we hired an environmental analysis group <br />in Roseville and these people did samples. They sampled the <br />lake, both in the existing outlets and at a location approxi- <br />mately here where there is an exis'ting 60 inch outlet which <br />serves another residential area further to the south. They <br />also sampled in the lake and they sampled some (inaudible) water <br />in these ditches to determine if the ditches were indeed serving <br />to clarify the water in any way as it's dealt with today. Some <br />of you have heard this before, particularly if you were (inaudi- <br />ble). They found many things. They found that Lake Josephine <br />is in a transition phase; that it's not the same as a northern <br />lake somewhere that has no pollutants. They found that this <br />lake is in fairly reasonable shape today. I guess it's all in <br />how you measure it, but at least for urban lakesj that it would <br />probably take ten years on a continuation of ten years before <br />you would get noticable measurable changes. I'm not saying it's <br />impossible to tell, but by the measuring devices it would be <br />probably 100 years before the lake would not grow fish and you <br />shouldn't swim in it. This is just what they found. <br /> <br />They also found that the storm water from these outlets <br />that are there today, and from the water that would be coming <br />in if we had the catch basins, is of a more contaminated nature <br />which is typical of urban areas, particularly residential where <br />you have the run off of nutrients, salt on the street, dirt. <br />These things are going to the lake and are of a lower quality <br />than what is in the lake today. In determining what we should <br /> <br />4 <br />