My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6335
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6300
>
res_6335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:09:44 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:48:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6335
Resolution Title
Approving County plans for County Road C Improvement No. P-75-13
Resolution Date Passed
1/19/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, / J' <br />/ r <br />,,/(/1 ' <br /> <br />/ -/- <br />~J,j~ <br /> <br />'i ~,33k, <br /> <br />Extract of Minutes of Meeting <br />of City Council <br />City of Roseville <br />Ramsey County, Minnesota <br />January 19, 1976 <br /> <br />pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular <br />meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />Minnesota, was held in the city Hall in said city on Mandai, <br />January 19, 1976, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mayor Demos and <br />Councilmen Anderson, curley, Grauel and Hess; and the <br />following were absent: none. <br /> <br />Also present were James F. Andre, city Manager, Robert <br />Bell, City Attorney; Charles Honchell, city Public works <br />Director; and Fred N. Peterson, Jr., of Peterson & Popovich, <br />city Bond Consultants. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I'd like to call the meeting to order at <br />this time. <br /> <br />* * * * * * <br /> <br />The first hearing is a public improvement to consider <br />the improvement on county Road C from Cleveland to the west <br />county limits. would you read the legal notice. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: I have the affidavit of publication and <br />Certificate of Mailing on file. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Would you care to give a summary of <br />financing and assessments, Mr. Peterson? <br /> <br />MR. FRED N. PETERSON, JR.: I assume everybody knows <br />what's going to be happening. This is roughly a concrete <br />curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing on "c" from <br />Cleveland going west. The total cost of the improvement is <br />$765,000 of which $53,790 will be paid by Roseville, and of <br />this $53,790, $24,690 is to be assessed to the property <br />owners abutting Cleveland, and the balance of $29,100 will <br />be paid from general taxes, so if you use the assessed front <br />footage on clevelar,d, it works out to be $2.73 per front <br />foot for concrete curb and gutter and the county is going to <br />pick up the cost for the surfacing. The assessments are <br />scheduled to run for 20 years at ~/o on the unpaid balance. <br />Any assessments can be paid within 30 days from the time of <br />the determination of the approval of the assessment roll. <br />This is the feasibility hearing so it doesn't start at the <br />present time and these are estimated figures of what it <br />would cost. If anybody wants to work out what your assess- <br />ment would be, just take your front footage and multiply by <br />$2.73 and you'd know what the total amount is, payable over <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.