res_6367 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

a bump there, where if this is okayed, then very possibly it will force the completion of the other things. I really don't know because I know there's quit.e a hump there at D and Cleveland. MR. LEONARD: The proposal that we have here for this rood improvement was developed entirely independent of any other pro- posals on Cleveland Avenue sometime prior to our eVen being aware of those. We had indicated on this plan that our grade would stop at the radius point short of Cleveland probably 60 or 70 feet before the intersection and it can be carried continuous around the intersection if two projects should afford an opportunity to combine (inaudible). There's no relationship between the two. One is a major traffic problem. Once we get off 35W the traffic drops off and they're really not tied to- gether and we can work out the grade problem. MR. THOMPSON: You could stop at the freeway ramp, or just east of it, and not touch any of D. MR. LEONARD: That was the original proposal to st.op 60 feet before Cleveland but we wanted to be able to get a - we wanted to make room for a car to get around there so we carried it almost to the intersection. MR. THOMPSON: That's such a hump; possibly if the other is approved, it will have to drop maybe one or two feet, but this will have nothing to do with that. MR. LEONARD: I would hope by doing them together we would (inaudible) . MRS. YVONNE BUCKLEY, 1866 West County Road C-2: Was there any provision for bikes or safety considering the junior high school there? MR. LEONARD: In our original proposal which was presented to New Brighton, we had proposed a bikeway on the north side which the Council asked us to investigate a sidewalk in lieu of the bikeway. Since that time, the county board has had pres- ented to it from the recreation department a system of bike trails which does not include a bike trail on this part of County Road D. Prior to that we had considered the addition of a bike trail on each improvement. Because of this new report, 5