Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(c) All other property not covered in (a) or (b) above, <br />to be assessed on an assessable footage basis at 100% <br />of the cost for the specific type of roadway on which <br />they abut, based on the costs for that segment of the <br />entire program including the roadway abutting the <br />property. <br /> <br />(d) In addition to the costs set forth in (a) through (c) <br />above, all property may be assessed a proportionate <br />share on a footage basis for expenses encountered for <br />right of way and easement acquisition necessary for <br />that segment of the entire program including the <br />roadway abutting the property. <br /> <br />(e) All corner and multiple frontage parcels in non-tax <br />exempt R-1 and R-2 classifications to be considered <br />to have no assessable footage on the side or second <br />frontage unless such parcels could be split or sub- <br />divided. For all other corner and multiple frontage <br />parcels the side or second frontage assessment shall <br />not exceed 150 feet. <br /> <br />(f) Properties abutting Minnesota State Aid city roadways <br />shall be assessed pursuant to this paragraph. <br /> <br />(g) All odd and irregularly shaped lots, which have rear <br />widths that vary by more than 25% in comparison with <br />the front width, the lot will be assumed to have a <br />depth equal to one-half the sum of the two sides and <br />said depth will be divided into the area of the lot <br />to determine the assessable frontage. Where this is <br />not practical, the assessable frontage will be deter- <br />mined by assuming the lot to have an assessable <br />frontage equal to those of the typical rectangular <br />lots near it which are comparable in overall area and <br />nature. <br /> <br />2. For properties abutting existing usable, temporary roadways <br />under the county's jurisdiction to be upgraded to permanent <br />roadways with curb and gutter, all provisions of Sections 1. <br />shall apply. In the event the special assessment procedure <br />should result in more funds being due the city from special <br />assessments than the total cost to the city of the improve- <br />ment of that county roadway, assessments for such properties <br />shall be reduced proportionately until the total assessments <br />equal the total city costs of the improvement to that county <br />roadway. <br /> <br />3. On all new public roadways constructed pursuant to this pro- <br />gram where no usable temporary roadway existed, the special <br />assessment procedure of Paragraphs 1. and 2. need not be <br />utilized. Such properties would normally be assessed at <br />100 % of the cost. <br /> <br />-2- <br />