Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. HONCHELL~ We could get rhe ownership records and <br />try t-o go lot by lotp but it \"ould tc:1ke quite a bit of time. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: Any lots on Victoria where there is <br />property owned behind by the same (inaudible) that could be <br />subdivided. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Yes, I believe so. \1hen you say splitting <br />off, you mean taking one lot and making ~everal, or ~wning <br />the lots behind them. There are some on Victoria that own <br />lots fronting on Victoria and own the lots behind them on some <br />of these roadways that would be buildable then. If you don't <br />own those prop,~rties to the rear, then you l,1Touldn' t be paying <br />for a.nything except the storm :3ewer assessment. <br /> <br />MR. JOHl~ F. MORRISmN, 3151 West Owasso Boulevard: Earlier <br />in the hearing you made ? statement that those lots where <br />the storm sewer drainage 1Nould not reach the development would <br />not be assessed, is that true? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Yes, if your water doesn't reach any of the <br />work that would be done for storm drainage, you would have no <br />benefit cmc1, therefore, you would not be assessed. <br /> <br />MR. MORRISON: Would that include those lot~ - number 7 <br />up to County Road D on Owasso Boulevard? They will drain to <br />valley Park. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: It depBnd~ on (inaudible). <br /> <br />MR. MORRISON: Isn't that an improvement of valley Park? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL~ We can't distinguish part of the water <br />from any of the rest of the water. <br /> <br />MR. MORRISON: How did you make your earlier statement? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: There are possibilities that when they <br />made this observation in the field, that they thought perhaps <br />some of the water ran in one direction, but it didn't - it ran <br />the other way, or maybe to a little pond on somerody's lot. <br /> <br />-21- <br />