My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6487
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6400
>
res_6487
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:00 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:52:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6487
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-76-23 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes, chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
5/9/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MAYOR DEMOS: I said at one time they came before the <br />Council and told us the taxes and assessments they had paid on <br />lots - two or three people - and not Mr. Reiling - who told us <br />what they had paid over the number of years and at that time <br />they told us what they had been offered by the county and that <br />figure was greater than what they were being offered by the <br />county. One thing we have to consider. Do we have the right <br />to confiscate a person's property by non-development. Now, <br />literally, when we make someone sit and tell them they can't <br />build, we're confiscating their property. You know and I know <br />that all the kids from that area use that whole area to play <br />in. They use motor bikes - they use snowmobiles. Everyone <br />uses it. Now, how long do we go on confiscating - that's what <br />the city does when they don't allow it to be developed. <br /> <br />MR. NOSBISH: The people along Owasso Boulevard that <br />own double lots - if you tally what they have paid over a <br />number of years, that comes to quite an amount. And their <br />land is undeveloped. I'm against it, but is his land mostly <br />by Avon and Brenner? <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I don't know. He made a statement that <br />it was up near Avon and Brenner. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: We don't like to have our land sit <br />there for lO or 15 years. We can't use our land. For 10 <br />years we haven't been able to do a thing with it. It's 1923 <br />Millwood. We bought the land to develop it. It was an <br />investment. We haven't gotten a penny out of it and we have <br />been paying and paying. We bought the land to develop ana <br />it's been costing us money and we can't do a thing with it. <br />It's being used by the people as a public park and that's <br />not fair. We're not in the public park business. <br /> <br />Several persons talking at the same time <br /> <br />MRS. MARY HANSEN, 3161 West Owasso Boulevard: Our back <br />property is right next to Valley Park, and we own the whole <br />piece there. Number 1 - the thing that strikes me tonight - <br />it seems like we don't get involved with things unless it's <br />our pocket books or our back yanGs, and I think we ought to <br />tune in on what's happening within our whole city limits. We <br />bought that property about three years ago, and I was under <br />the impression it would go into Open Space and I got on the <br />band wagon and fought a lot of battles with Ramsey County to <br /> <br />-34- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.