My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6487
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6400
>
res_6487
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:00 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:52:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6487
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-76-23 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes, chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
5/9/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Do I get assessed not at all except the $295 if this project <br />goes through. The $295 drainage assessment I'm resigned to <br />because the water does flow back in there, but what about <br />the front footage assessment? Is this a special thing I <br />should take up with the Council after this meeting. <br /> <br />MR. BELL: I would doubt they'd assess you. You have a <br />peculiar situation. I would suppose the Council would decide <br />you couldn't use the street back there. <br /> <br />MR. ALBRECHT: The engineer siad I could petition probably <br />either way and split it and pay the assessments if this is a <br />salable lot. <br /> <br />MR. BELL: I suppose you could get the street extended if <br />you wanted to pay the assessments. I suppose they'd accommodate <br />you. <br /> <br />MR. ALBRECHT: 11m sorry to see the whole area developed. <br />It's one of the most beautiful in the city. If it has to be <br />developed, I want to put in a good word for the pond here. We <br />have been here 12 years and there has been water standing here <br />and I think it's a worse mosquito area now than if it was a <br />5 foot pond. This little piece here - what's my procedure <br />for finding out what my options are. <br /> <br />MR. BELL: You'd almost have to extend the street to <br />facilitate it. <br /> <br />MR. ALBRECHT: There are 40 feet so there could be a <br />driveway put in. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: If you contact our office if the project <br />is ordered in, and advise us if you wish to have that considered, <br />because we would have to develop utilities to you in the way <br />of sewer and water and you would be given the opportunity with <br />the rest of the people to pay assessments. <br /> <br />MR. ALBRECHT: Ir. seems we could be in a favorable position <br />as to whether ro pay the assessments or split the assessments. <br />I notice some of the younger people displayed great dismay about <br />the lots back here. I got the same reaction from my kids who <br />are in their twenties who said - oh, terrible - don't split that. <br />I'm within lO years of retirement. This wouldnlt be split while <br />we live there, but it might be that I retire a year earlier and <br />retire a year younger. Your perspective changes with age. 1111 <br />check separately on this because it appears it's something that <br />could not be decided on. <br /> <br />-40- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.