My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6487
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6400
>
res_6487
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:00 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:52:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6487
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-76-23 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes, chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
5/9/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. HONCHELL: The standard policy is if they have <br />any water that gets into the facility, they are liable. <br />(Inaudible) if it goes through the middle - there's Lot 2 <br />south of Brenner - it cppe?rs to go right through the middle <br />of the lot. Assuming they haven't ever been assessed for <br />storm sewer, they would then be proposed to be assessed <br />$295.00. On the other hand, if there's ever another storm <br />sewer needed along West Owasso, they would not be charged <br />anything because they would have paid their a~sessment. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Some of the houses on Victoria were in- <br />cluded in the storm sewer to the west. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Then they would not be charged for this <br />improvement, and there are some lots, as I mentioned, to the <br />south that are in the plat that are not within the storm <br />sewer area. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: Where is the property - the 35% <br />of the people that are in favor of it. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Generally near Brenner. One thing I <br />did not mention because it's ~ort of standard policy, but <br />the city's existing policy on side lots is that they only <br />are assumed to have 10% assessable frontage as long as they <br />are a normal buildable lot. If you had an 85 foot lot, or <br />say 100 feet on the front, and 140 feet on the side - I don't <br />see any that have that exact - take number 1 down near Brenner - <br />that's close. You'd only be assessed lO% along Brenner. If <br />you had an extremely large lot that was dividable, you'd be <br />assessed more, but most of these are not. But the ratio is <br />10% along the side to make assessable frontage. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: At t-his time I'd like to open the hearing <br />to the public. I would ask that you come to the microphone <br />and state your name and address, and if we can keep one of <br />these slides on, indicate to Doug where your lot is so we <br />know what you're talking about specificCllly. <br /> <br />MR. CLINTON SMITH, 3006 North Victoria: I've been working <br />on this parcel of land for about 10 years, trying to get it for <br />Open Space and, as we all know, it's pretty well beaten now. <br />But I feel that since that area that - with the lots are the <br />ones that are going to be benefiting from this - the existing <br />property owners get no benefit whatsoever. As a matter of fact, <br /> <br />"I! <br /> <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.