Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I live in a spot where three lots to the west of me there's a <br />street light, right next to me there's a church parking lot <br />with two lights next to my property line. To the south of me <br />and west there are more church lights, and right behind me <br />within, I'd say 35 feet of my property line - there's a lighted <br />tennis court. I have plenty of light in my area, and I don't <br />have any complaint from anybody about too much light. I've <br />heard lots of complaints about darkness so my feeling is that <br />I will vote in favor of it. <br /> <br />Councilman Curley then introduced the following resolution <br />and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />Resolution No. 6'5t./7 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF <br />IMPROVEMENT UL-77-9 UNDER AND PURSUANT TO <br />MINNESOTA STATUTES CHAPTER 429 <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville, <br />Minnesota, that in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota <br />Statutes 1961, Chapter 429, as amended, the Council held a <br />public hearing on the proposed Improvement UL-77-9 consisting <br />of the installation of ornamental street lights on Shorewood <br />Lane from Wheeler Street to Lydia Avenue, and Shorewood Curve <br />from Wheeler Street to Shorewood Lane, as described in the <br />Notice of Hearing at a cost presently estimated at $1,295.50, <br />and substantially in accordance with the preliminary report <br />as to the feasibility thereof which is now on file in the <br />office of the City Manager, and having considered the views <br />of all interested persons and being fully advised in the pre- <br />mises, the Council does hereby determine and order that said <br />improvement shall be constructed and financed, and special <br />assessments shall be levied therefor, pursuant to said Chapter <br />429, and that the area proposed to be assessed therefor shall <br />include the property as described in the Notice of Hearing. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution <br />was duly seconded by Councilman Hess, and upon roll call vote <br />being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: All, <br />and the following voted against the same: None, whereupon said <br />resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />