My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6548
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6548
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:06 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:53:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6548
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. UL-77-10 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
9/12/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: I agree, but I think the petition - <br />what we would have to do is start allover, but it would spread <br />your assessments a little thinner by including a few other <br />people in the assessment hearing. <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: For just that one light. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: you'd have two more people. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: One family said as long as it was for <br />the people on our cul-de-sac they wouldn't be assessed. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: If we're to include the others (inaudible) <br />hearing. We must deny it at this point and order a new one. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: What would the idea of the difference in <br />cost be? <br /> <br />MR. STRONG: We don't know how far they have to bury it. <br /> <br />MR. KRAMER: This is on a case by case basis by them. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: What does this study where we got the <br />figures for the ornamental lights - that has the price and <br />everything. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: What was the price on that? <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: $518. <br /> <br />MR. KRAMER: That is the cost of Alternate 2 with one <br />standard and one ornamental. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: The notice said installation of <br />ornamental lights. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: There is no charge fi:> r the regular street <br />lights. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: Here it said two lights. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: There are two lights, but one is a standard. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN ANDERSON: It doesn't say two lights. It just <br />says ornamental street lights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.