Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. GODFREY: But - all right then, this procedure - how <br />would we go about tabling this? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: Some Councilman would have to move <br />to extend the hearing and (inaudible). <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: Our original notice was for ornamental <br />street lights. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: How long will this take. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN HESS: But you have to notify the other people. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: I move this be continued to the 26th <br />day of September. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN ANDERSON: Second the motion. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />. All voted in favor thereof . <br /> <br />. . . . <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN ANDERSON: At that time, what are we going to <br />receive. Are we going to get the costs - up-dated costs which <br />would be still spread over these pieces of property that are <br />shown here? <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: Why would we have to pay for two lights as <br />opposed to one light, and the (inaudible) for another one? <br /> <br />both. <br />pole? <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: If ornamental, you would have to pay for <br />If it's ornamental overhead, is there a cost for the <br /> <br />MR. STRONG: The cored pole and the boring is the charge <br />that Northern States Power charges the city. We will still pay <br />the rate if it were a standard light, so they are only paying <br />the difference. <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: But it seems to me that light at the end of <br />the cul-de-sac - should the cost for that light - that light <br />should be (inaudible) by the persons that are on Transit that <br />are served by that light. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: There are two people on Transit. <br />