My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6549
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6549
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:06 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:53:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6549
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. W-77-14 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes, chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
9/12/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the eight inch system further south along Lexington, crossing <br />Lexington to the east side where it would hook into an eight <br />inch line being constructed now jointly by Paster Enterprises <br />and the elderly high-rise constructed on the Johnson property. <br />A portion of the Paster property on the west side of Lexington <br />and the Minnesota Federal Savings institution has been assessed <br />for the previous watermain and would not be assessed in this <br />project. <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: This involves a tract of land that has <br />already been developed, and some tracts that are undeveloped. <br />There is a total published cost of $52,815. There are 716.89 <br />assessable feet and in order to work this out - the Standard <br />Oil property that's already developed, in conformance with your <br />past practice, would be assessed at $8.50 per foot, and the <br />other two undeveloped properties would be assessed at 100% of <br />the total cost which works out to be $57.63 for a total of 616.89 <br />feet, and this would be the Margolis property and the Paster <br />property. This would be payable over a 20 year period with <br />the 8% on the deferred charges. And, of course, everybody <br />would have the right to prepay within the first 30 days after <br />the assessment roll is adopted. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: We have no written communications. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I will ask that everyone who wishes to speak <br />come to the mike, give your name and address, and speak pro or <br />con. <br /> <br />MR. IRV MARGOLIS: I represent the owners of the property <br />on Lexington and Larpenteur on the northwest corner. I can't <br />see where this watermain would benefit us any way. We're al- <br />ready hooked up to the St. Paul water system, and for our <br />sprinkler system we're hooked on to the Roseville system, so <br />we derive no benefits from this. Yet, we would be taxed for <br />it, so on the basis of that we are not in favor of this project. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: When we come through with an improvement of <br />this sort, it's to serve the property, not necessarily the <br />current owner or the current use. There could be, in 15 years, <br />someone come in and decide to redevelop that. You might decide, <br />and it might be more feasible to connect for some reason or <br />another if you develop what you have - the parking lot there <br />into a building of some sort - and serve it from Roseville. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.