My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6586
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6586
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:09 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:54:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6586
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. P-ST-SS-77-19, Alternate 2, under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/29/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COUNCILr~N CURLEY~ The reason I ask the question is our <br />Public Works Administrator feels he couldn't recommend Alternate <br />1 without having a storm sewer feasibility report, is that <br />correct? <br /> <br />HR. HONCHELL: ThatOs correct. <br /> <br />COUNCIL~T CURLEY: We could go ahead (inaudible). <br /> <br />~1RS. rlILTON SEGAL, l83 7 Ag len : Hm., come they s topped at <br />Roma and did not go down to the end of the street? It's from <br />Roselawn to Dionne. How corne they stopped at Roma? There's <br />only one block - five or six houses. <br /> <br />rmYOR DEHOS: The Council did not institute this. This <br />carne in by petition. I can't tell you why they didn't go any <br />further. Since it came in by petition, we would not have the <br />right to go ahead and say we will do that block too. <br /> <br />HRS. SEGAL: It will be awfully funny to stop at one end <br />and leave one street without the curbing, and finish it off on <br />Roma when it should be finished off on Dionne. <br /> <br />COUNCILHAN CURLEY: I don't mean to be facetious, but a <br />year ago we tried to get a city-wide program, but doing it <br />piecemeal, it has to stop somewhere. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: It was the intent to present to the <br />residents last year a proposal to develop a street system - <br />permanent street system in the community - and those who were <br />opposed to it showed up at the meeting. Those who were in <br />favor of new streets did not show up, and consequently, the <br />proposal to put in new streets throughout the community was <br />voted down and we have to do the next best thing, and that is <br />to determine a policy and how we can assess the residents and <br />yet encourage them to build streets and continue to develop <br />our community in a manner that each of us could be proud, and <br />it's now got to be a piecemeal basis, on a petition by the <br />residents because I doubt if this Council is going to propose <br />something in the near future for improving the street system <br />in Roseville without a petition from the residents. <br /> <br />COUNCILrUlW HESS~ I feel our assessment policy of 25% at <br />$7.47 a foot against 100% is a good deal for the people on <br />Aglen Street. I thin]c in today' s market $ 7.47 a foot is a <br />real bargain because the rest is being spread over the city. <br />I would be in favor of this alternate No.2. <br /> <br />COUNCILr~T CURLEY: Needless to say, I was accused during <br />the campaign of promoting the whole thing a year ago and I <br />would love to see a few people up here (inaudible). <br /> <br />COUNCILHAN GRAUEL. then introduced the follo\'Jing resolu- <br />tion and moved its adoption: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.