My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6587
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6587
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:10 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:54:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6587
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. P-77-20 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/29/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />part, we're not saying "do it", we're proposing it as an <br />alternative to be considered by the neighborhood. This is <br />something I am sure the neighborhood will have a voice in. <br /> <br />MR. CONNORS: So at this time I said I was for Ryan <br />Avenue, but as the proposal stands, I'm against the project. <br />I'll be against the project until the people on Shryer <br />Avenue and the people on Ryan Avenue from Oxford to Lexington <br />are agreeable to it. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Are you also against Ryan alone? <br /> <br />MR. CONNORS: Yes, I am. <br /> <br />MR. NORMAN GORANOWSKI, 988 Ryan: Part of what's happened <br />here - we had a discussion with the engineering department, and <br />the way they led us to believe is if we say we want Ryan we're <br />automatically going to get stuck with Oxford too. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: That's not true. <br /> <br />MR. GORANOWSKI: That's the way the engineering department <br />led us to believe. If we say we want to go ahead with Ryan, <br />and they (inaudible) the petition, and we said we want to up- <br />grade Ryan, and they said about $7.50 a foot and that's what <br />we thought, and when the discussion was made with the engineer- <br />ing department they said it's entirely up the Council whether <br />or not Oxford is thrown in with the Ryan project. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: That's true. That's why that's all seen <br />broken apart and put back together. We can never expand a <br />project, but we can cut it down. <br /> <br />MR. GORANOWSKI: The way it was explained by the engineer- <br />ing department, the alternative was Ryan and all of Oxford. <br />Alternative 2 was Ryan and the northern section of Oxford. <br />That's why we're under the impression that we got (inaudible). <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: You can still get Ryan by itself and the <br />estimated cost is $7.65 a front foot, if I'm not mistaken. <br />It can be done Ryan alone, or Oxford alone, or together, <br />with two alternatives. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.