Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: What are you for? <br /> <br />MR. GORANOWSKI: I'm for Ryan alone - not including <br />Oxford because, you know, it's bringing the cost of one <br />side (inaudible). The one thought I had. I have heard <br />your fiscal manager say he recommends a 25% assessment. <br />If you want to spread out the cost of Oxford, reduce that <br />25% to IO% for them and put it over the whole city. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: The law wouldn't allow us to do that. <br /> <br />MR. GORANOWSKI: That was my thought. If you want <br />to spread it out (inaudible) to reduce their assessments, <br />but I'm for just strictly Ryan as proposed. <br /> <br />MR. RAY HERMANSON, 1019 West Ryan: I am for the Ryan <br />Avenue only proposal - 77-20. <br /> <br />MR. LAWRENCE TSCHIDA, 1027 Ryan: I'm the one that <br />started this deal. I don't know how they got Oxford in <br />that. When I went to the people I told them Ryan alone, <br />and they sure got us goofed up with Oxford. I have a lot <br />of enemies now. <br /> <br />MR. FRED MC CARTHY, 1002 Ryan Avenue: I got the notice <br />of a hearing for 77-20 including all property on Ryan Avenue, <br />and I'm for it. <br /> <br />MR. RUDY KESSLER, 993 Ryan: The way it stands now, I'm <br />against the whole works. <br /> <br />MR. GEORGE MOONEY, 1986 North Lexington: My property <br />has the back toward Ryan where he points, and I'm for this <br />project. I certainly have nothing against improving Oxford <br />too. I should say, both OXford and Ryan, and it seems a <br />logical improvement. I can't see much sense in improving <br />Ryan without improving Oxford too. Thank you. <br /> <br />MR. GORDON ROBIDEAUX, 1010 Ryan: The engineer made a <br />statement that on one of their proposals, I guess, or feasi- <br />bility studies, that it would be feasible so that the people <br />