Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I guess at this point I'd rather stop and go through <br />some of the numbers for Oxford alone, and again, before we <br />get into the numbers, remember that in the past, side lots <br />on the side portion rather than the front portion, are only <br />assessed 10% of whatever the distance is. This lot of 158 <br />feet would only be assessed for 15.8 feet, the exception <br />being this middle lot, and there it's frontage. They would <br />be assessed for the entire 140 feet. But if you start hearing <br />some of these numbers, it's not 154 feet of assessment, but <br />15.4 feet. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: The total published cost was $33,861.59 <br />but the Public Works Department now estimates that $31,901 <br />would be the total cost - roughly $2,000 less. <br /> <br />For the street, curb and gutter portion, the total cost <br />there is $24,020 and the frontage is 210.37 assessable feet. <br />If that were 100% assessed it would be $114.19 a front foot. <br />It's recommended at 25% of that and it will come to $28.55 <br />which would raise $6,000 for special assessments, and the <br />balance of $18,013 would go on general taxes. That's the <br />street, curb and gutter portion. <br /> <br />On the watermain portion, that cost is $6,485, and the <br />total assessable footage is 215. If 100% assessed, it would <br />be $30.15 a front. The recommendation is 25%, or $8.50 a <br />front foot. That will bring in $1,827 and the balance of <br />$4657 will go on general taxes. <br /> <br />There are two services for water service, and, of <br />course, that's always 100% assessed from the street to the <br />lot line. That's $292.50, and for sanitary sewer service, <br />which is also 100% assessed, it would be $405.50. There <br />are only those two that would pick that up. <br /> <br />We would recommend 20 year assessments at 8% with the <br />right of prepayment as has been our policy. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: If we could now - discuss the possibi- <br />lity if these two projects were combined, namely the Ryan <br />and Oxford improvements, and we'd like to think about this <br />